There are a number of competing theories that underpin the profession of arms. There always will be as people of differing experience levels and intellect espouse their version of the 'correct' theory. If the profession of arms is the management of violence as some say, that implies order from chaos. That has been achieved by proponents of various theories and I suggest, as the saying goes, there is no wrong answer -- unless one wishes to relegate it to an academic pursuit. I think that would be a very bad mistake. Academic precision is nice, combat rarely is.
Yes, you do see engineers having opinions about single span bridges -- if we did not, then there would be no need to seek proposals for design selection.
I'd say no -- I'd say he was achieving Local Superiority.If mass is no longer required, then when a J-TAC calls in a combined Fast Air, NGF and Atry strike on a high value target, is he not concentrating mass in time and space?
Agility, initiative and local superiority?If mass is no longer required, what is the opposite of mass, that we should be emphasising?
Bookmarks