I just finished a short paper on the subject of Network-Centric Warfare. As far as it being revolutionary, I doubt it. As far as I can see, it is mearly a way of further integrating C2ISR much like signal flags, mounted messengers, the telegraph, wireless communications, and the advent of the computer did in the past. So far, much of what I've read indicates that much of the superior performance attributed to networked organizations can be filtered away when you notice that they fought with superior weapons and after long periods of uninterrupted training.

So, I feel I have a good understanding of the networked stuff, but what I don't get is the comparison to "system-centric" organizations. As far as I can tell, we're still just acquiring new systems.