So that figure is a sound basis for discussion, based on the fact it happened once?
On what do you base that assertion. You are stating a fact?Advance through defence is of little interest today in general. There are enough gaps for advance, and no continuous line of defence. You don't need to advance through deep defensive positions in most conventional warfare scenarios.
How do you know where the enemy defence is? Finding the defence is the problem we are discussing.
So how do we do this? What do you suggest as useful data sets around which to base a discussion?You can - if you prepare well for it - rather go back to an extremely accelerated version of Central European 18th century army maneuvers (Wars of Silesia as examples).
Speed of advanced in defended terrain was irrelevant then and it is (almost) today.
Bookmarks