"material support" for terrorist case, Humanitarian Law Project cases.

Analysis: Anti-terrorism case not an easy one
Humanitarian Law Project cases; Argument recap
Lyle Denniston | Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010 11:33 am

Analysis

With a federal government lawyer pushing for a sweeping interpretation of the government’s most-used anti-terrorism law, the Supreme Court on Tuesday at times seemed tempted to conclude that, perhaps, the law may go too far. Although some of the Justices made it clear they were sympathetic to Congress’ attempts to stop aid to international terrorist groups, a somewhat surprising skepticism set in as the 62-minute argument in the Humanitarian Law Project cases unfolded. Near the end, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., suggested that the “material support” law may need another airing in lower courts, with that statute perhaps having to clear a higher constitutional hurdle — an option that could make it unnecessary for the Court to decide now what swing-vote Justice Anthony M. Kennedy called “a difficult” case. .... (much more at SCOTUSblog)
I don't do tea leaf analysis based on oral arguments, but a fair bet is that the Supreme Court will not issue a unanimous opinion in a few months.

Regards

Mike