Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: German occupation of France(1940-1944)model for regime change?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #8
    Council Member M-A Lagrange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    In Barsoom, as a fact!
    Posts
    976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin23 View Post

    On your point in regards to what the author said, the French as a whole as well as those in other Western European countries(even many of those who collaborated with the Germans). Were obviously not thrilled and overall highly unhappy about the defeat and overthrow of their home governments.
    Right

    However to further touch on what the author said, the vast majority didn't resist and the resistance in countries like France didn't gain widespread support despite this. Because the population and societies of the occupied countries largely accepted that new European and International order that the Nazi Regime was attempting to establish through aggression, had legitimacy and deserved a try since as we know the previous democratic governments weren't as a whole viewed as very successful.
    Partly right for France
    Some part of France did liberate them selves and several "insurgent"/resistant were hardly crushed. Which brings the question of who is an insurent and who is a resistant (freedom fighter). (No doubts on my side about resistance against Nazi regime but still, the question remains).

    The Nazi Regime further played on this by putting policies in place that attempted to create a less harsher and more benevolent occupation in countries like France, Denmark, the Netherlands and the remaining WWII occupied nations in Western Europe.
    Wrong. The STO Service de Travail Obligatoire (mandatory work service) in germany was one of the trigger of the rally to the resistance cause.
    But it is true that the problematic of the democratic regime was not the one coming first.
    Also, you have to consider that many of the resistant were communist.As long as the Nazi regime did not attack USSR, they did not move. The day Hitler launched Barbarossa, it was another story.

    The German occupation and administration in occupied Western Europe was more successful in preventing upsprings and guerrilla war, then the stark strategy practiced on the Eastern Front in the occupied Soviet Republics, like Belarus , the Ukraine, or parts of Russia it's self.
    What about Yougoslavia?
    It is true that French resistance was not that powerfull but the actions taken at the end of the war to prepare Operation Overlord were of some importance. As example, the resistance destroyed almost all bridges between Paris and Normandie.
    Last edited by M-A Lagrange; 07-27-2010 at 02:43 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. North Korea: catch all thread
    By SWJED in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 408
    Last Post: 04-24-2015, 03:17 PM
  2. 2007 Apache Engagement on Video: Appears Incriminating
    By Schmedlap in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 07-31-2010, 08:23 AM
  3. The concept of "adaptation"
    By RJO in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 103
    Last Post: 09-14-2007, 04:47 PM
  4. Recognizing and Understanding Revolutionary Change in Warfare
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2006, 09:59 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-24-2006, 07:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •