Quote Originally Posted by Ron Humphrey View Post
This whole lack of "what you want" end-state thing seems kinda confusing to me.

Doesn't pretty much everyone agree that any desired end-state would be;
Don't want to have to be concerned about something major going down by them or someone they supply that would lead to much larger issue's?
It seems we live in an everything is negotiable world.

The wishy washy "well we wouldn't like them to have a nuke but we are not going to lift a finger to prevent it" attitude seems to prevail in certain quarters... and that sends out the wrong message to the Iranian regime. Like ostriches they bury their heads in the sand... saying problem, what problem?