Your scientists have yet to discover how neural networks create self-consciousness, let alone how the human brain processes two-dimensional retinal images into the three-dimensional phenomenon known as perception. Yet you somehow brazenly declare seeing is believing? Your scientific illiteracy makes me shudder, and I wouldn't flaunt your ignorance by telling anyone that you saw anything last night other than the planet Venus, because if you do, you're a dead man.
[/QUOTE]
Declaring a problem solved without providing an answer is a Pentagon trick.
Video of object's contrail starts about about 0.28 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AMdHBgHtNE
Oh yeah, definitely a Southwest Air commuter... if it has two wings shorn off and is defying gravity. 'Zippy' is a good description, don't you think?
Scroll up to Post #6, this was already self-hijacked <pinky to lips>
Meanwhile, Pentagon thumbs remain firmly lodged in their third points of contact.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/natio...ve-it-20101110
*
- naval analyst Raymond PritchettWhen someone makes an unannounced launch what looks to be a ballistic missile 35 miles from the nations second largest city (at sea in international waters), and 18 hours later NORAD still doesn't have any answers at all - that complete lack of information represents a credible threat to national security. If NORAD can't answer the first and last question, then I believe it is time to question every single penny of ballistic missile defense funding in the defense budget. NORTHCOM needs to start talking about what they do know, rather than leaving the focus on what they don't know.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...hing-near-l-a/
Bookmarks