I disagree, there are many examples where strategy isn't even focused on an enemy (especially non-military strategies).

Besides - what does "UN-BALANCING the Enemies ends,ways,and means." mean at all?

The German strategy for defeating France in 1940 certainly didn't do that, but the success was 100% against France. That strategy was employed boldness to counter superior economic support and it created a scissor-paper situation with the operational success of a decisive battle idea against the long positional warfare idea of the French.

The enemy's ends, way and means weren't unbalanced, but simply countered with custom-designed approaches which were fuelled by desperation.