SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Global & General > Global Issues & Threats

Global Issues & Threats Trans-national issues and actors. Culture and the Clash of Civilizations.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2011   #1
Rex Brynen
Council Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,568
Default USIP funding cut?

Full disclosure: I've both received two USIP grants, and am currently working with them on another project, so my view might be a little biased. Still, this seems a rather silly way of enhancing the ability of the US to deal with complex peace and security challenges:

House votes to cut all funding for US Institute of Peace

By Eric W. Dolan
The Raw Story
Thursday, February 17th, 2011 -- 6:45 pm

Quote:
The US House of Representatives accepted an amendment to the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2011 on Thursday to eliminate all funding for the US Institute of Peace (USIP), an independent government-funded institution to analyze and prevent international conflict.

"I am very pleased my amendment to end federal funding for the US Institute of Peace was voted on and accepted by my colleagues in the House," Rep. Chip Cravaack (D-MN), one of the co-sponsors of the amendment, said. "If signed into law, this amendment will save the taxpayers $42 million this year. Washington has been spending beyond its means for years. We must look for places to make cuts so we are not piling mountains of debt on future generations."

The amendment was also co-sponsored by Reps. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and Jason Chaffetz (R-UT). It was accepted by a 268 to 163 vote....
What is most remarkable, however, is the argument given for cutting USIP by two of the prime-movers behind the amendment in a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal--namely, that is Washington shouldn't be "using taxpayer money to fund a private organization." USIP was established by an act of Congress, and the composition of its Board of Directors shows that it is anything but "private":

Quote:
The Board shall consist of fifteen voting members as follows:
(1) The Secretary of State (or if the Secretary so designates, another officer of the Department of State who was appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate).
(2) The Secretary of Defense (of if the Secretary so designates, another officer of the Department of Defense who was appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate).
(3) The president of the National Defense University (or if the president so designates, the vice president of the National Defense University).
(4) Twelve individuals appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
__________________
They mostly come at night. Mostly.
Rex Brynen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2011   #2
jcustis
Council Member
 
jcustis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,940
Default

While I have enjoyed USIP publications myself, I am admittedly scratching my head a bit. $42 million a year?
jcustis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USIP report: Iraq in the Obama Administration Rex Brynen US Policy, Interest, and Endgame 1 12-18-2008 07:40 PM
Army too stretched if Iraq buildup lasts tequila US Policy, Interest, and Endgame 7 09-20-2007 12:59 PM
Iraqi insurgents taking cut of US rebuilding money tequila Who is Fighting Whom? How and Why? 0 08-27-2007 03:29 PM
Bush Keeps Vow to Veto War Funding Bill SWJED US Policy, Interest, and Endgame 0 05-02-2007 08:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation