I know this is a sub-issue in this thread, mainly for our USA members and a few who live this side of the Atlantic - the perception that Europe is not paying it's way in European security and the USA is frustrated at this.

Can I point out that such criticism is a long standing factor in relations across the Atlantic, notably with NATO, later the EU and sometimes with others in Europe. At times the USA has sought help in places where some over here have demurred, for example in both Gulf Wars.

In the Libyan action very few European nations have an active role, even if the NATO command structure and more (logistics & bases) are being used. There is a political and public viewpoint that the action will not contribute to European security, indeed will have an adverse impact.

Nor are many European nations (whether in NATO, the EU or not) prepared politically to back 'liberal intervention', let alone have the will and capability to get "boots on the ground". Those nations sometimes contribute "boots" and cash to UN peacekeeping, e.g. Irish infantry being in eastern Chad recently to protect Sudanese refugees.

The USA during the Cold War made a massive contribution to West European security, which sometimes meant a high risk to those nations, notably Germany and NATO's two senior military commanders were American, still are in fact.

Yes, many European nations have "free-loaded" since the Cold War ended and now feel they decide on security policy, even if that means a political price is paid with the USA.