Hardly. You're sticking to an outdated early try to get a constitution right.
It's so full of gaps and badly outdated stuff. Just look at the election process for presidency that allows for a president who lost the popular vote.
The primitive majority vote that discards millions of votes it badly obsolete as well. It was actually never necessary to have such a primitive mode of elections. Basic math allows for a much better mode.
A mix of voting for party AND voting for candidates (~as in Germany) allows for having regional representatives with strong connection to their region AND a representation that's proportional tot he actual preferences for parties. It also allows for more than two practical parties, while the obsolete majority vote systems force a two-party system onto the land.
There's even more to be criticised, but we hadn't any major attempts at improving constitutions for six decades, thus few examples of really advanced designs.
Your constitution that was basically designed for oligarchy is hardly "excellent".
Bookmarks