Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 39

Thread: U.S. alpine warfare capabilities?

  1. #1
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Question U.S. alpine warfare capabilities?

    My understanding is that the 10th Mountain Division carries the <Mountain> designation for reasons related to its history rather than as a description of its contemporary capabilities and that the relevant Army and Marine Corps schools do primarily individual rather than unit training. Is the lack of a large unit dedicated to alpine warfare a calculated decision on the part of the DoD? Are there any small units optimized for mountain warfare? If my understanding of what the Special Forces do is correct I would assume there are SF teams for which this is true, though I understand that there might be some OPSEC concerns there.

    Appreciated,
    Matthew
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2

    Default 86th IBCT

    The 86th IBCT (Vermont ARNG) is now trained for Mountain Warfare.

    Hate to use wikipedia as my source link but I cant find any of the original sources right now http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/86th_In...ited_States%29

    Moderator's Note

    Post just approved and clearly pre-empts some of the following posts, PM to author.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 08-27-2011 at 10:04 AM. Reason: Add Mod's Note

  3. #3
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    It's imho a good idea to wait till the AFG campaign is over, for nowadays (afaik) alpine qualification is more about the preparation training for AFG deployment than about real formation specialisation.


    There was a great amount of public criticism and outright bashing post-Anaconda concerning the 10th Mountain Div and its lack of mountain training area, lack of acclimatisation prior to deployment, lack of alpine expert trainers and so on.

  4. #4
    Council Member ganulv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Berkshire County, Mass.
    Posts
    896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    There was a great amount of public criticism and outright bashing post-Anaconda concerning the 10th Mountain Div and its lack of mountain training area, lack of acclimatisation prior to deployment, lack of alpine expert trainers and so on.
    I think (could be wrong) that the Vermont National Guard runs the Army’s mountain warfare school. I’m not clear as to whether any of their units are true alpine warfare units or not.

    The area around Watertown is flat as a board, but it’s close enough to the Adirondacks for easy day trips. But to keep acclimated to altitude within U.S. territory a unit would need to be based out west.
    If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)

  5. #5
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default All the above is correct. Probably not good that it is...

    The 10th is now only historically linked to its forebear which was trained for alpine warfare when it formed and trained at Camp Hale Colorado during WW II. It did fight in Italy; in the Appenines and the Alps.

    Hale post WW II shifted from unit to individual training and later was closed in the 50s. Mountain and Cold Weather Training was moved to Fort Greeley, Alaska. It was closed post Cold War and the VT ArNG picked up the mountain training mission to include for the Active Army. It is individually focused but the School used to be willing to send out Mobile Training Teams to aid units training, probably still do but certainly could if deemed necessary. People in the Active Army also get sent to other nation's real mountain warfare schools (that's not a knock on the Vt Guard but on the fact that, in Vermont, the available mountains aren't...), to include India's but as Gunlv says, to do units, a western location would be necessary.

    Anaconda suffered from more flaws than a lack of training, an overweening bureaucracy being but one. That overly bureaucratic bit and its allied overemphasis on force protection is in part a reaction to our less than stellar training; one cannot expect better than average or even average performance from below average training so one tends to be excessively cautious in employment. The sad thing is that Grenada, Panama, Desert Storm, the Somalia affair and even moving into Bosnia where Rick Sanchez was afraid to have his Engineers bridge a river in an end 1995 non combat situation all were harbinger and examples of how not to do things. Or, more correctly, how to do things wrongly, expensively, cautiously and without achieving the desired effect in a timely fashion while taking and causing unnecessary casualties...

    That's what happens when you treat your Army not as a real and existing military force but as a mere holding pool of people, funds and equipment for a mobilization and big war you might not ever see. That attitude BTW, is not totally a post Viet Nam phenomenon but it has grown exponentially and dangerously since VN. I believe that is true due to a -- flawed and failing IMO -- effort to influence US policy. The effort has not done that and has instead done the institution itself and the people in it a grave disservice. Not done well by the nation, either...

    As Jon Custis once wrote, it's fortunate that most of the folks we fight are even more screwed up than we are...

  6. #6
    Council Member Fuchs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    As Jon Custis once wrote, it's fortunate that most of the folks we fight are even more screwed up than we are...
    Did you already give back your U.S. citizenship?

    You sound so totally un-American...after all, hooah!!!, Tom Clancy, easy bashing of underdeveloped nations' militaries, huge budgets and so on have convinced MANY U.S. Americans (and others) that all that shines is platinum.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    1,602
    They mostly come at night. Mostly.


  8. #8
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ken White View Post
    Anaconda suffered from more flaws than a lack of training, an overweening bureaucracy being but one. That overly bureaucratic bit and its allied overemphasis on force protection is in part a reaction to our less than stellar training; one cannot expect better than average or even average performance from below average training so one tends to be excessively cautious in employment.
    Quite. Especially when one considers that the 10th only provided headquarters elements for Anaconda...the combat force (outside of SpecOps) was from the 101st. Mix and match has become one of our other hallmarks, and we never remember that it quite often doesn't go well...
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  9. #9
    Moderator Steve Blair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,195

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rex Brynen View Post
    Naw...now that we have microbreweries we don't need to go north.
    "On the plains and mountains of the American West, the United States Army had once learned everything there was to learn about hit-and-run tactics and guerrilla warfare."
    T.R. Fehrenbach This Kind of War

  10. #10
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Cool Nah, wouldn't trade it for anywhere else...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fuchs View Post
    Did you already give back your U.S. citizenship?
    With all our flaws, we still do better on more things than do any others of whom I'm aware. Many nations out perform us in specific areas but no one nation is as lucky to have so many fortuitous synergies roll into one acceptable but admittedly not great package.
    You sound so totally un-American...after all, hooah!!!, Tom Clancy, easy bashing of underdeveloped nations' militaries, huge budgets and so on have convinced MANY U.S. Americans (and others) that all that shines is platinum.
    I think much of that is due to the failings of our media -- that's one area where even the worst in the world are ahead of us. A senior British Officer once said of our news people that their pathetic performance made us look like intemperate and rather ignorant clowns in the eyes of most of the rest of the world -- and he was IMO absolutely right. He added that he was truly shocked in actual interplay to find out that the truth was quite different.

    Contrary to what those Squirrels say, show and write, my observation is that most Americans are pretty well aware of our benefits and shortfalls. The problem is that we're individualistic enough to squabble endlessly over what to do about correcting said shortfalls so needed results are agreed to but the routes are subject to almost endless negotiation and argument. Thus correction comes slowly -- though I sense that may be changing. Exasperation with Washington is always present and waxes and wanes but I think it has edge now that I've never seen before. The political crowd, the media, the White House and Congress really need to wake up and smell the coffee.

  11. #11
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default Mix and match, plug and play works quite well with well trained troops.

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Blair View Post
    Mix and match has become one of our other hallmarks, and we never remember that it quite often doesn't go well...
    Lacking well trained or experienced troops, the results are predictably really bad -- and thus caution inspiring...

    An unfortunate side effect is the creation of a culture of "I want only people I know to work for me." This attitude means eschewing the pipeline (which will be the only source of replacements in a larger war...) and creates sycophants. It also drives many good people out of the forces (plural...)

  12. #12
    Council Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Mountain, West Virginia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    During World War II the 10th Mountain trained at Dolly Sods, West Virginia, now a wilderness recreation area. It's high plateau country and said to have cliffs that the mountain troops used for training on climbing and rappelling. Never saw the cliffs the time I was there.

    A girlfriend and I went camping there in 1986. Before we went there she told me how pristine and untouched it was, just like the way it was when Mother Nature had made it. Therefore imagine my startled reaction when we drove in and there was a big sign in color mounted on two posts saying
    EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE!
    IF YOU FIND ONE OF THESE DO NOT TOUCH!

    This of course was followed on the sign by images of 81mm, 4.2-inch and 105-mm projectiles. My thought was here I go again.

    The main road through the recreation area is straight as an arrow courtesy of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, not a more winding road like civilians or park rangers would have built. Nancy and I had a nice weekend. A local greasy spoon where we ate breakfast had an iron-framed Henry Rifle from the Civil War in fair condition for sale for $700 that I did not buy; today it would be worth about $20-40K, it's hard to say.

  13. #13
    Council Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Mountain, West Virginia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    When I was at Virginia Tech in 1976 I managed to snag a World War II mountain troops field jacket in unissued condition for a nominal sum. Three hippie-types driving a 1950s station wagon had a breakdown and they were selling their possessions to raise money for repairs.

    The jacket was different from the standard WWII one in major ways -- it had a zipper on the front and on its pockets and also a G.I. khaki belt that went through a tunnel around the waist . The buckle was the old-fashioned hollow square kind, not the shiny brass of the dress uniform or the 1950s.

    The jacket had a cargo compartment in the back that opened with a zipper, as well as adjustable packstraps inside. I read that the straps were not for carrying cargo in the back, but rather to allow the jacket to be taken off and carried on the back when temperatures in the mountains go from winter at night to summer during the day.

    The firm Willis & Geiger is said to have been the company that made these jackets. They were a rich-guys' outfitter based in NYC that sold outdoor stuff to Theodore Roosevelt, Amelia Ehrhart and Earnest Hemingway. W&G designed and made the main Army Air Corps leather jacket of WWII.

    W&G went out of business around 10 years ago, Their business model was to sell extremely expensive reproduction military stuff to guys who are legends in their own minds, like the author Tom Clancey. (You can see him on his back covers wearing his Ray-Bans and their flight jackets.) The last owner of W&G, Land's End, let the company go under about 10 years ago because of its financial problems.

  14. #14
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Some online refs - WWII 10th Mtn Div

    These two deal primarily with training:

    Studies in the History of the Army Ground Forces, No. 28, "History of the Tenth Light Division (Alpine)."

    Studies in the History of the Army Ground Forces, No. 23, "Training for Mountain and Winter Warfare."

    This one covers one regiment's combat history:

    History of the 85th Mountain Infantry in Italy

    One of the factors giving rise to the division's formation was the relative success of Finnish skiers in the Winter War.

    Our neighbor's son (item 8 iii - F.A. Romberg) was a good skier and 100% Finnish, and ended up in the 85th Mountain Infantry (KIA 14 Apr 1945, Castel d'Aiano, Italy - SS citation).

    Regards

    Mike

  15. #15
    Council Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Mountain, West Virginia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmm99 View Post
    One of the factors giving rise to the division's formation was the relative success of Finnish skiers in the Winter War.
    I didn't know they had tall mountains in Finland, so for the first time in my life I must be wrong again. Blame it on our insular American culture in which we have little awareness of foreign peoples and places. No wonder the Soviets had all the trouble they did in Finland, what with all of those 14,000-foot mountain ranges and such that they have there.

  16. #16
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    499

    Default

    I don't know why the US Army hasn't embraced the idea of a true alpine unit. Perhaps it wouldn't need to be a division but at least a brigade. Basing such a unit at Ft. Carson is usually mentioned but Ft. Huachuca would be another possibility. The desert mountains of the southwest might serve as a good substitute for parts of Afghanistan.

    My unit conducted annual winter training in the Italian Alps, but that's just what it was: winter training in an alpine environment, not training as true alpinists. We spent a lot of time on snow shoes pulling the ahkio around, setting up the arctic tent, and firing up the Yukon stove but we did no technical climbing or rope work. I suppose it was good toughness training but it sure wasn't technical training.

    On a historical note, I'm aware of three technical climbs by US units in WWII: Riva Ridge by elements of 10th Mtn Div, Pointe du Hoc by 2d Ranger Bn, and Monte la Difensa by First Special Service Force. And although I said US units, I haven't forgot that FSSF was half Canadian.

    Not sure about the Dieppe raid. I know 4 Commando with some 1st Ranger Bn attached made a climb there to attack a battery but I'm not sure if it was a technical climb or a scramble of sorts.
    "Pick up a rifle and you change instantly from a subject to a citizen." - Jeff Cooper

  17. #17
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,021

    Default Pete, any good Finlander....

    can handle making molehills into mountains. Look at what the Delaware Finns (the first Finns in the US in the 1600s) did to West Virginia - and that was by long-distance sorcery.

    Seriously, a major Russian problem (leading to ceasefires in the Winter and Continuation Wars) was not just the Finnish capability to inflict casualties, but also the Finnish capability to accept casualties. Let's look at some KIA comparisons.

    In the Vietnam War, the USA had ~58,200 KIA, as compared to a 1970 pop. of ~203,000,000. That works out to .287 KIA per 1000 pop.

    South Boston (per Jim Webb) had 25 KIA, as compared to a pop. of ~34,000. That works out to .735 KIA per 1000 pop.

    Our "Copper Country" area (4-county totals; specifics in the Vietnam Wall.pdf attached to this post) was between the USA and South Boston - 29 KIA, 1970 pop. 55,253; .525 KIA per 1000 pop.; although Ontonagon County exceeded South Boston - 9 KIA, 1970 pop. 10,548; .853 KIA per 1000 pop.

    Before we hit the next paragraph, one should reflect on the fact that the Vietnam War was not an "existential war" to the USA.

    My grandfather was born in the village of Pörtom (Pirttakylä), Finland. During the Winter & Continuation Wars, the Pörtombor sustained 75 KIA, from a 1940 pop. of 3,324. That computes to 22.563 KIA per 1000 pop. For a pop. of 203,000,000 (USA 1970), equivalence would require 4,580,300 KIA !!! The two Finnish wars were more "existential" than not.

    The Pörtombor have no particular claim to fame, but were simply representative (Finland for both wars: ~88,000 KIA & MIA, 1940 pop. ~ 4,000,000; 22.0 KIA & MIA per 1000 pop.).

    A possibly substantive factoid (from my cousin whose ancestry is Pörtombor, but who grew up in another nearby community) is that young, male Pörtombor have a reputation for cruising around in neighboring communities looking for festivities (e.g., wedding receptions) and picking group brawls. Cf., Dave Grossman's and Lonnie Athens' theories on violence.

    Regards

    Mike (and from Mannerheim the Dog )

    PS: just for the sake of the record (from AGF No. 23 cited in post #14 above):

    ... As American newspaper readers became bored with the war in December 1939 a new conflict broke out between small Finland and the giant Soviet Union. The Finns, instead of being overwhelmed as most observers expected, surprised the world with the tenacity and effectiveness of their resistance. Ski troops, clothed in white to mask their moves' disrupted Russian Supply columns and won victory after victory.

    Those initial victories of the highly Specialized Finnish winter troops aroused the interest of American political and military leaders. On 6 January 1940, Louis Johnson, the Assistant Secretary of War, asked General Marshall what consideration the General Staff had given to the subject of special clothing, equipment' food, transportation and other essentials necessary for an effective field force under conditions approximating those of the campaigns in Finland and Northern Russia.[1]

    Three weeks later The Chief of Staff replied that operations of this nature had been under continuous study in connection with the problem of the defense of Alaska. Winter training had also been conducted annually by troops stationed in severe climate and had been especial y successful at Fort Snelling, Minnesota, where some of the men had become highly skilled in the use of skis. "It is my intention," General Marshall added' "to continue, accelerating where practicable, tests of food, clothing, equipment and transportation in order to standardize for the purpose the types best suited to operations under severe winter conditions. The campaign in Finland is being studied and should be of considerable assistance. Winter maneuvers, on a larger scale than yet attempted are desirable, but to date funds for this purpose have not been available."[2]

    1. Memo of Mr. Louis Johnson, ASW, for the CofS, USA, no file, 6 Jan 40, sub: Campaign under Extreme Conditions of Weather. In AGO 370.22 (1-6-40)

    2. Memo of the CofS, USA, G-4/31624, 24 Jan 40, sub as above. Ibid.
    So, blame the Finnish link on Louis A. Johnson (a resident of West Virginia).
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by jmm99; 08-29-2011 at 05:51 AM.

  18. #18
    Council Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Mountain, West Virginia
    Posts
    990

    Default

    This place is named for a kinsman of mine. Around 1900 Gus Eisen gave the testimony to U.S. Congress that caused Sequoia National Park to be founded right before the logging companies got in there and turned the trees into picnic tables.

  19. #19
    Council Member Firn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,297

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rifleman View Post
    I don't know why the US Army hasn't embraced the idea of a true alpine unit. Perhaps it wouldn't need to be a division but at least a brigade. Basing such a unit at Ft. Carson is usually mentioned but Ft. Huachuca would be another possibility. The desert mountains of the southwest might serve as a good substitute for parts of Afghanistan.

    My unit conducted annual winter training in the Italian Alps, but that's just what it was: winter training in an alpine environment, not training as true alpinists. We spent a lot of time on snow shoes pulling the ahkio around, setting up the arctic tent, and firing up the Yukon stove but we did no technical climbing or rope work. I suppose it was good toughness training but it sure wasn't technical training.
    Training individuals is certainly no proper way to make a true mountain brigade, as especially on high altitudes and very difficult terrain and weather every untrained or unfit person becomes a liability to your squad/platoon. To pull off combined arms under such circumstances training needs, well, to train that.

    Ciaspole/Snowshoes with ski poles and akhios are an excellent way to help non-skiier to move through high snow, and are superior in very steep slopes or difficult terrain but are of course inferior in not so dense vegetation, roads, and generally open terrain. Sadly with the abolition of the "leva" the Alpini have no longer a very large pool of good skiiers among the rank, as the volunteers are no longer from the local valleys and regions but mostly, roughly 70% from southern Italy (Puglia, Campania, ...). You also no longer find nowhere as easily recruits with already considerable technical or Alpine climbing or mountaineering experience which could be prime material for guides. It is a bit sad to hear instead of furlan, piemontèis, lumbard, now the napoletano or other southern dialects, but the forces are not attractive enough for men and women from the wealthy regions.

    Of course the regional character has thus been greatly weakened and the connection between the brigades and the locals can no longer be as strong as they used to be. Also you no longer have a fair rappresentation of all the population, and the low pay and not so good education does very little to attract certain members of our society.

    Anyway I still believe that proper leadership, discipline and training are more important and the increased time of service should in theory compensate the weaknesses of the new ways. New times, new ways. Let us just hope that this concept won't get tested too severly.
    Last edited by Firn; 09-01-2011 at 07:46 AM.

  20. #20
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    123

    Default

    US Army often send some troops to India for some mountain warfare training. But AFAIK they conduct these exercises on HAWS, Gulmarg instead of Parvat Ghatak school, Tawang.

    Royal Marines also came for the joint exercise few years back and didn't fair well. Most of the contingent failed to cope up with the altitude.

Similar Threads

  1. US Army Irregular Warfare Fusion Cell
    By SWJ Blog in forum Doctrine & TTPs
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-31-2017, 12:02 PM
  2. The Army Capstone Concept: the Army wants your comments
    By Westhawk in forum TRADOC Senior Leaders Conference
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 03-19-2011, 12:00 AM
  3. Iraqis jailing innocents, U.S. officials say
    By tequila in forum Iraqi Governance
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-15-2007, 09:51 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-26-2006, 04:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •