Quote Originally Posted by KenWats View Post
I read the abstract, but I'm not familiar enough with the units of radioactive decay to figure out what they're measuring the increase of with the bacteria. I've seen curies, rads, and sieverts used before in various applications, but nothing with the abbreviation Bk (Bq, bequerel?) and a google search lead me to the Burger King homepage. I guess that's what an undergrad engineering degree with 2 semesters of physics buys you these days (and 15 years of knowledge decay). Figuring out what they measured the increase of (and how large the increase was compared to their measurement error) would be my first step in deciding whether this was something I personally will keep an eye on or not.
Bacterial cells, even in relative low concentrations, do NOT form a solution, but a suspension with much higher concentration on the bottom of the flask, this can easily be demonstrated with UV spectroscopy.
Therefore, the described "control experiment" is completely useless and misleading as cells which bind/incorporate caesium were not used. Or in other words, sedimentation of the ceasium containing cells is a likely source for the "destruction" of radioactivity.