SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > The Small Wars Community of Interest > RFIs & Members' Projects

RFIs & Members' Projects Looking for something? Float your question here, and see what the community has to say in response.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2012   #1
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,619
Default Head cameras: LE use in the USA?

A colleague and I recently discussed the use in the UK by LE of modern technology, in particular the use of mini / head-cameras.

The UK is well known for having millions of CCTV cameras, sometimes the results seen in “fly on the wall” documentaries, using CCTV, vehicle-mounted video cameras and still a cameraman. I was in the USA over Xmas and noted when watching a few police TV shows none used the mini-cameras.

The impetus for head-cameras here came from a bar threatened with closure for disorder etc and their website is: http://www.robocamuk.com/node .

There is a short CNN News clip:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKjZIm9nNgs

Wearing these cameras has become an option for non-law enforcement personnel, notably in high-risk actions or locations, for example door staff at clubs and bars. Here is an example of a cyclist –v- a ‘road rage’ motorist:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zWt1SYTlZU

Are there reasons for the apparent lack of interest in head-cameras?
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2012   #2
slapout9
Council Member
 
slapout9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Slapout,Al.
Posts: 4,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
A colleague and I recently discussed the use in the UK by LE of modern technology, in particular the use of mini / head-cameras.

The UK is well known for having millions of CCTV cameras, sometimes the results seen in “fly on the wall” documentaries, using CCTV, vehicle-mounted video cameras and still a cameraman. I was in the USA over Xmas and noted when watching a few police TV shows none used the mini-cameras.

The impetus for head-cameras here came from a bar threatened with closure for disorder etc and their website is: http://www.robocamuk.com/node .

There is a short CNN News clip:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKjZIm9nNgs

Wearing these cameras has become an option for non-law enforcement personnel, notably in high-risk actions or locations, for example door staff at clubs and bars. Here is an example of a cyclist –v- a ‘road rage’ motorist:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zWt1SYTlZU

Are there reasons for the apparent lack of interest in head-cameras?
I don't know for sure but it may be technology overload. There is so much Tech and Money floating around becuase of Homeland Security sometimes it is hard to abosrb it all. Just speculation on my part.
slapout9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012   #3
Uboat509
Council Member
 
Uboat509's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CO
Posts: 681
Default

Cost and complexity are probably factors but I suspect that the thought of having their actions second guessed after the fact by someone sitting safely behind a desk does not appeal to US LE.
__________________
“Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.”

Terry Pratchett
Uboat509 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012   #4
Firn
Council Member
 
Firn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uboat509 View Post
Cost and complexity are probably factors but I suspect that the thought of having their actions second guessed after the fact by someone sitting safely behind a desk does not appeal to US LE.
I guess that it must be the latter and other issues, as the technology is mature and not too expensive, at least from those bike kids video on youtube and a quick google
Firn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2013   #5
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,619
Default

An update after Twitter id'd this Forbes article 'Watching The Police: Will Two-Way Surveillance Reduce Crime And Increase Accountability?':http://www.forbes.com/sites/tarunwad...rove-policing/
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2013   #6
KenWats
Council Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uboat509 View Post
Cost and complexity are probably factors but I suspect that the thought of having their actions second guessed after the fact by someone sitting safely behind a desk does not appeal to US LE.
Which is kind of funny, given how helpful the dashboard cameras seem to have been as evidence during DUI stops.
KenWats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013   #7
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,619
Default NYPD told to have 1k body cameras

Quote:
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin ordered a pilot program of the cameras and other major reforms to the New York Police Department's stop-and-frisk policy this week, after she found the NYPD intentionally discriminated against minorities.......In New York, Scheindlin ordered one police precinct per borough where the most stops occur to host the yearlong pilot program. That means possibly more than a thousand officers would be recording with cameras on their eye glasses or lapels.
Link:http://online.wsj.com/article/APf61b...KEYWORDS=lapel
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2013   #8
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

related video
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013   #9
condottiere
Council Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Default

Cameras don't lie, at least not without leaving clues showing manipulation.

Technology just gets cheaper and better, so it's more a question of where society will allow the expectation of privacy.
condottiere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013   #10
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,619
Default A visual generation

There are ample signs in England that if a criminal prosecution lacks some video footage - if relevant or possibly available - then managers and prosecutors maybe reluctant to press ahead. For example for benefit fraud, where a claim is made for disability, three separate video clips are needed that show the person is able bodied, e.g. lifting heavy weights.

At court it is well known that magistrates will give weight to video evidence. It will be interesting to see if this changes when the defence has their own video. Even in a relatively short incident at Downing Street gates, known as "Pleb Gate", the video record has been challenged.

As a society we are becoming a visual generation; no pictures, nothing there.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013   #11
slapout9
Council Member
 
slapout9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Slapout,Al.
Posts: 4,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
As a society we are becoming a visual generation; no pictures, nothing there.
Some years ago I was at an Officer Survival seminar and a defense Attorney was giving a lecture about courtroom testimony, evidence, etc. One of his points was that whenever possible he would use Visual evidence not Testimony or audio evidence. Visual is much more persuasive at least based upon his courtroom experience which was considerable.
slapout9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2013   #12
TheCurmudgeon
Council Member
 
TheCurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 985
Default

Quote:
Some years ago I was at an Officer Survival seminar and a defense Attorney was giving a lecture about courtroom testimony, evidence, etc. One of his points was that whenever possible he would use Visual evidence not Testimony or audio evidence. Visual is much more persuasive at least based upon his courtroom experience which was considerable.
I remember hearing a lecture on evidence as to which was more powerful, 100 nuns who say they watched the courtyard all night and never saw anyone cross it or the footprints in the snow across the courtyard demonstrating that someone had crossed it during the night.

That being said ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbfpo View Post
As a society we are becoming a visual generation; no pictures, nothing there.

... I was actually just thinking the oposite, that today I cannot trust anything on video.


http://www.noupe.com/inspiration/50-...portraits.html

With the right technology I can prove that velociraptors shot Kennedy...
__________________
"I can change almost anything ... but I can't change human nature."

Jon Osterman/Dr. Manhattan
---

Last edited by TheCurmudgeon; 08-15-2013 at 08:00 PM.
TheCurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013   #13
carl
Council Member
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver on occasion
Posts: 2,395
Default

Something else to wear, more wires to route, another battery to check, more opportunity for your Sgt and anybody on high to bug you, more things to catalog and store and if the durn thing malfunctions in operation, storage or retrieval what you witnessed didnt really happen. And more OJ juries who firmly believe that if it ain't on tape, it didn't really happen.

To me this is just another manifestation of the modern cultural belief that we can make things perfect if we only have another machine. In the long run little good will come of that belief.
__________________
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene
carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013   #14
slapout9
Council Member
 
slapout9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Slapout,Al.
Posts: 4,669
Default SF Fire Chief Bans Helmet Cams

Not LE but close. San Francisco Fire Chief has banned helmet cameras.




http://news.msn.com/videos/?ap=True&...om=en-us_msnhp
slapout9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2013   #15
carl
Council Member
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver on occasion
Posts: 2,395
Default

Slap:

There is something I just thought of when I read your post. Do you think some the the less thoughtful guys might do some grandstanding for their head cameras they might not otherwise do?
__________________
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene
carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013   #16
selil
i pwnd ur ooda loop
 
selil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fly over country
Posts: 2,097
Default

I had to operate in a 360 surveilance environment. Guys would grandstand and idiots would idioate. All on film. CIs shutdown. The footage from non related times would be used to embarrass. Scratch your crotch, pick your nose, it was all there on film ready to be edited into a story that didn't happen.
__________________
Sam Liles
Selil Blog
Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.
selil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2013   #17
slapout9
Council Member
 
slapout9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Slapout,Al.
Posts: 4,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carl View Post
Slap:

There is something I just thought of when I read your post. Do you think some the the less thoughtful guys might do some grandstanding for their head cameras they might not otherwise do?
Definitely!
slapout9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2013   #18
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

http://de.scribd.com/doc/130767873/S...e-use-of-force

used camera: http://www.taser.com/flex

Moderator's Note

Normally to avoid copyright issues SWC removes Scribd links, on this occasion it appears the publishers, the Police Foundation, have loaded this article onto Scribd, so it remains here. Nice article too, thanks (ends).

Last edited by davidbfpo; 08-22-2013 at 11:48 AM. Reason: Add note
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2013   #19
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,619
Default

The use of body-worn cameras is spreading, although with some resistance and taken from a BBC News report the rationale:
Quote:
Incidents can be subject to interpretation whereas with the cameras we've got that real view of what actually did happen.
Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25024204
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cctv, law enforcement, technology

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fighting Roadside Bombs SWJED Intelligence 29 09-17-2008 03:23 PM
Secretary-general Accepts Resignation Of Security Head redbullets NGO & Humanitarian 0 06-27-2008 01:31 AM
Navy Officers Head to Afghanistan to Join PRT Teams SWJED OEF - Afghanistan 0 04-19-2006 04:00 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation