SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Adversary / Threat

Adversary / Threat One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Talk about (or with?) them.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2012   #1
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 1,459
Default MPs warn over nuclear space bombs and solar flares

Quote:
The government must take more seriously the threat of a nuclear weapon being exploded in space by a rogue state, MPs have warned.

The Defence Select Committee said the resulting radiation pulse could disrupt power and water supplies, UK defence and satellite navigation systems.

Its chairman, Tory MP James Arbuthnot, said an attack was "quite likely".

The committee is urging ministers to invest in more "hardened" technology to cope with such an event.

It looked at the threat to the UK's technological infrastructure from "electromagnetic pulse" (EMP) events in space, which could also include the eruption of solar flares.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17117836
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #2
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

That's a 30 year old scare. It was questionable in regard to the USSR and is an idiocy indicator when used in combination with terrorists or Iran etc etc

Jason Sigger battled the scaremongers for a while:

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-crazies.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...l-reports.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...emp-crazy.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...to-senate.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...-of-crazy.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...iscussion.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-crazies.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...concerned.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...t-company.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-threats.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...p-effects.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...to-europe.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...es-attack.html

http://armchairgeneralist.typepad.co...out-there.html

and more, more, more...

Or this
http://dickdestiny.com/blog1/2010/06...ok-and-others/



I own an old book from about 1982, compiled by the FAS or some other scientists organisation (didn't see the book in a while). The chapter on EMP from 1982 mentioned that 4 500 kt (or was it 1 Mt?) warheads exploding in a patter over the U.S. at hundreds of kilometres altitude would have a good, but not at all all-frying effect on electronics.
It was a secondary concern when the USSR had thousands of nukes and operational SSBNs. It's a ridiculous concern now.
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #3
tequila
Council Member
 
tequila's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,654
Default

Generally speaking, if Newt Gingrich is exercised about it, it's not worth worrying about.
tequila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #4
J Wolfsberger
Council Member
 
J Wolfsberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 806
Default

Well, the article at the BBC was written by someone with only a little knowledge of nuclear weapons, Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) or Coronal Mass Ejections (CME). It pretty much reduces to "something bad could happen and somebody ought to do something about it." (Which is typical of FAS scaremongering.)

That said ...

Nuclear weapons could be used to generate a High-altitude Electro-Magnetic Pulse (HEMP) that would destroy or degrade a lot of electrical and electronic systems. How much and how widespread depends on the design and installation of the electrical/electronic device/system and the structure of the attack. The kind of damage the good MP is concerned about would take a pretty sophisticated attack. The yields and launch systems required rule out all but the US, Russia, and China. (Possibly the UK and France could be included.) The idea that a rogue state, such as N. Korea or Iran, could do that is ... bizarre.

CME is a serious threat, largely because the standard approaches to protecting electrical systems from everyday events, such as surges and lightening strikes, would be turned into a vulnerability. However, with sufficient warning, which we would have, the damage can be minimized by simply shutting down the power grid for a few to tens of hours. (Look up the Carrington Event, which was a CME striking the Earth.)
__________________
John Wolfsberger, Jr.

An unruffled person with some useful skills.
J Wolfsberger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2012   #5
Entropy
Council Member
 
Entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tequila View Post
Generally speaking, if Newt Gingrich is exercised about it, it's not worth worrying about.
Haha.

I really don't get the EMP crazies.
__________________
Supporting "time-limited, scope limited military actions" for 20 years.
Entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2014   #6
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 1,459
Default

Electromagnetic Warfare Is Here
A briefcase-size radio weapon could wreak havoc in our networked world
http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/m...arfare-is-here
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation