SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Military Art & Science Applied > Equipment & Capabilities

Equipment & Capabilities Relevant capabilities and equipment are table stakes for winning those hearts and minds.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2012   #1
ganulv
Council Member
 
ganulv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Berkshire County, Mass.
Posts: 868
Default Tactical wireless.

Danger Room ran a piece today [LINK] describing the acquisition of a broadband wireless network for dismounted infantry as the U.S. Army’s “number one program going forward.” I understand the theoretical utility, but if there is one truism regarding digital data it is that the time saved thanks to ease of transmission are counterbalanced by time eaten up sifting through piles of transmissions.

Is anyone on the forum willing to argue that this is an unequivocally good idea?
__________________
If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)
ganulv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012   #2
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,822
Default

We ran around in the heart of darkness with a SATCOM. Something similar to a large suitcase that weighed in at a brisk 35 keys

So, picture this: You're in relatively hostile territory and you stop in the middle of nowhere and start setting up the SATCOM. You've got this senseless looking antenna that you start aiming into the blue yonder based on compass readings. About 15 minutes has gone by and you finally get a decent signal and connect your "secure telephone" and attempt connection. Once connected you plug in this plastic cryptographic key and the whole enchilada goes dead

In sum, whatever the Army does has to be better. It may not be good, but it will be darn expensive !
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012   #3
ganulv
Council Member
 
ganulv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Berkshire County, Mass.
Posts: 868
Default

I thought about it for a few minutes and I couldn’t come up with any foreseeable alternative for those way out in the sticks besides satellite phones. Nor much apart from more satellites to improve their use. Another point up above or offshore to receive and strengthen the signal, maybe? (Though every new point would introduce security risks, I assume.) I have an acquaintance who recently retired from a career in the Signal Corps, I’ll bounce the question off her (haha) and see if she has anything to add.
__________________
If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed. – Mark Twain (attributed)
ganulv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012   #4
Stan
Council Member
 
Stan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Estonia
Posts: 3,822
Default

Matt,
We were traveling northeast from Goma through Rwanda's Volcano National Park over 3 kilometers high - all said and done, about as good as things get looking for satellites

I used to run field power for the 67th Signal Battalion. Back then, those people humped even more "Jurassic Park" looking devices that didn't work.
__________________
If you want to blend in, take the bus
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
coms, data, technology, wireless

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Articulating the tactical to strategic realtionships to the Inter-Agency and others Rob Thornton Training & Education 17 04-25-2008 10:10 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation