SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > The Small Wars Community of Interest > The Whole News

The Whole News Post and debate the news; good, bad and ugly. News ignored by the mainstream media especially welcomed here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-2012   #1
EffectsDiaspora
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Behind you.
Posts: 4
Default FBI had prior knowledge of STRATFOR targeting

Been pouring through the indictment for Lulzsec, that lil mayhem cell that sprang forth from Anonymous' womb (the hacker bandits), and later targeted STRATFOR, but some things are not adding up.

Sabu (CW-1 or Chief Witness 1 in the indictment), a member of Lulzsec was caught, flipped and released, for lighter sentencing early on in 2011, serving until recently as an FBI informant in the cell.

Through his duties as mole he provided early warning on the behaviours of his co-conspirators, and acquired, among other information, advance knowledge that STRATFOR was being targeted as early as December 6 2011(as indicated by chat logs, PAGE 16 of the indictment currently published on guardian.com). According to the afidavit, he also provided a server (courtesy of the FBI page 13 indictment) to the other members, in order to store the stolen STRATFOR data. The possibility that the hackers stored the data on multiple servers is mentioned(the indictment page 13 also). The indictment suggests that the hack began around December 14, 2011 (page 2, also 17; suggests hack began on December 13)

So either the FBI was unwilling, or unable to act in order to protect STRATFOR, despite having advanced warning? Seems kind of strange to my untrained self to sacrifice a company and it's clients, while you have information that can protect them. Did the FBI maybe collaborate with STRATFOR in some covert or less visible manner? Your thoughts?

The indictment:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...source=message
EffectsDiaspora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012   #2
AdamG
Council Member
 
AdamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hiding from the Dreaded Burrito Gang
Posts: 1,333
Default

Russia Today spins it -

Quote:
A pretrial hearing in the case against accused LulzSec hacker Jeremy Hammond this week ended with the 27-year-old Chicago man being told he could be sentenced to life in prison for compromising the computers of Stratfor.

Judge Loretta Preska told Hammond in a Manhattan courtroom on Tuesday that he could be sentenced to serve anywhere from 360 months-to-life if convicted on all charges relating to last year’s hack of Strategic Forecasting, or Stratfor, a global intelligence company whose servers were infiltrated by an offshoot of the hacktivist collective Anonymous.

Hammond is not likely to take the stand until next year, but so far has been imprisoned for eight months without trial. Legal proceedings in the case might soon be called into question, however, after it’s been revealed that Judge Preska’s husband was a victim of the Stratfor hack.
http://rt.com/usa/news/anonymous-str...ond-judge-440/
__________________
A scrimmage in a Border Station
A canter down some dark defile
Two thousand pounds of education
Drops to a ten-rupee jezail
AdamG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012   #3
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,106
Default

What puzzles me more is that conspirational organisations still haven't figured out how to deal with caught and 'flipped' members.

It's not that hard to prepare against such a well-known standard tactic, after all.


About the prior knowledge / FBI thing; as I understand it public services in the U.S. can be sued with success if they were capable of protecting someone, but didn't.
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012   #4
carl
Council Member
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver on occasion
Posts: 2,220
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EffectsDiaspora View Post
So either the FBI was unwilling, or unable to act in order to protect STRATFOR, despite having advanced warning? Seems kind of strange to my untrained self to sacrifice a company and it's clients, while you have information that can protect them. Did the FBI maybe collaborate with STRATFOR in some covert or less visible manner? Your thoughts?

The indictment:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...source=message
I believe the Whitey Bulger case demonstrated that the FBI is sometimes not averse to sacrificing citizens in order to make a case.
__________________
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene
carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2012   #5
bourbon
Council Member
 
bourbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 898
Default

Anonymous recently hacked DEBKA File, which is an Israeli site known for peddling intel/news of dubious veracity. Could be interesting if Anon got the email spools.
__________________
“[S]omething in his tone now reminded her of his explanations of asymmetric warfare, a topic in which he had a keen and abiding interest. She remembered him telling her how terrorism was almost exclusively about branding, but only slightly less so about the psychology of lotteries…” - Zero History, William Gibson
bourbon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012   #6
EffectsDiaspora
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Behind you.
Posts: 4
Default

i bet the folks at stratfor are enjoying the news of the attack on debka. i hear they don't think to highly of that outfit.

i have to admit though, i do read debka every now and then for both entertainment value and to adequately define my left and right limits.

regarding the FBI handling of STRATFOR hack and pre-attack intelligence; as it's been a year now, and no additional information/condemnation/complaints have surfaced, i'm assuming they followed their SOP and any concerns anyone may have had were probably unfounded.

regarding anonymous' lack of countermeasures, or hardening itself against infiltration; i think it's tough enough for states/agencies to counter infiltration, much less loosely affiliated hacker collectives.
EffectsDiaspora is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
defense, fbi, intelligence, stratfor

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Terrorism in the USA:threat & response SWJED Law Enforcement 231 2 Days Ago 01:00 PM
Saddam Hussein Talks to the FBI Jedburgh Catch-All, OIF 1 07-06-2009 02:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation