SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > The Small Wars Community of Interest > RFIs & Members' Projects

RFIs & Members' Projects Looking for something? Float your question here, and see what the community has to say in response.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-23-2012   #1
pvebber
Council Member
 
pvebber's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rho Dyelan
Posts: 130
Default JOAC SME request?

I'm working on putting together a forum on the undersea 'domain' (I know its not officially one...) and wondering who to invite to talk about the JOAC - preferably someone involved in the writing?

Event will most likely be in June in DC area.

Thanks!
__________________
"All models are wrong, but some are useful"

-George E.P. Box
pvebber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2012   #2
selil
i pwnd ur ooda loop
 
selil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fly over country
Posts: 2,087
Default

Krepinevich is the only one I know of in the DC area. But, I don't know if he was a writer or not.
__________________
Sam Liles
Selil Blog
Don't forget to duck Secret Squirrel
The scholarship of teaching and learning results in equal hatred from latte leftists and cappuccino conservatives.
All opinions are mine and may or may not reflect those of my employer depending on the chance it might affect funding, politics, or the setting of the sun. As such these are my opinions you can get your own.
selil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012   #3
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,287
Default

What does the abbreviation JOAC mean? For the non-defence SWC member.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2012   #4
pvebber
Council Member
 
pvebber's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Rho Dyelan
Posts: 130
Default

Sorry, "Joint Operational Access Concept"

Link

It's been the subject of a fair amount of criticism, some of it deserved, some not. I will start a discussion thread under futurists and theorists below.

It adds as a central idea "cross domain synergy" as a compliment to the Capstone Concept for Joint operations central idea of "joint synergy".

What is the difference? Some say there really is none, others treat "cross domain" as 'magic pixie dust" to solve problems.

To me its a subtle distinction. Where "domain = service" (i.e air = Air Force, Sea = Navy, and Land = Army) then Cross-service (joint) = cross-domain.

The part where discussion can gets interesting is when you start too include the "new domaains". The Joint Capability Areas effectively treat a wider array of "domains" then are "officially recognized":

Land, Underground, Sea, Undersea, Air, Space, Cyber, and the Electromagnetic Spectrum.

These are called out as "environments" within which interaction with the adversary can occur. The difference between an "environment" and a "domain" seems more budgetary, than operational, but that may be overly cynical on my part.

Each of the services now have requirements and responsibilities, to some extent in far more than their "home" domain. Cyber is great example as all the services have cyber capabilities and are struggling to operationalize them - particularly given the tension between tittle X (ten) and Title L (50) - military operations vs national covert operations.

How do you go from "domain = service" to "services = many domains" in the joint construct? Operational C2 today at the serivce = domain level is so time consuming that it struggles to meet required decision-making time requirements. Added a host of new coordination requirements will slow it down even more.(true?)

So does that mean, as the Army did with combined arms, a need to push coordination decisions down to lower levels? I think yes, and that the Navy and Air Force can learn a lot from what the Army (and USMC) have gone through pushing "decision-making with operational implications" lower down the chain.

Unfortunately the Air-Sea Battle construct (a sub-concept under the JOAC) seems to driving the Maritime Operations Center and Air Operations Center into a combined Mega Operations Center with a tremendously expanded span of command into all the "domains".

I'm convinced this will result in an unwieldy command leviathan that has no chance of keeping up with the tempo of operations required to succeed at the "access task". Others disagree.

I'll cross post this below in futurists and theory - please respond there.

Thanks!
__________________
"All models are wrong, but some are useful"

-George E.P. Box
pvebber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intelligence or Law Enforcement Professionals - Request to Participate JeffC RFIs & Members' Projects 9 12-04-2007 10:53 AM
16 Senators Request More Naval Funding SWJED Equipment & Capabilities 3 06-27-2006 07:27 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation