SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Small Wars Participants & Stakeholders > Futurists & Theorists

Futurists & Theorists Future Competition & Conflict, Theory & Nature of Conflict, 4GW through 9?GW, Transformation, RMA, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2012   #1
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,109
Default Lessons learned and experiment results used the smart (cheap) way

There are several not-so-friendly words for people who think they cannot learn yb looking at what others do or others say. So obviously, in a world of about 7 billion people and only a tenth of them being in the 'Western' world, NATO etc. - there's necessarily a lot of progress being made elsewhere, or just stupidities being avoided elsewhere.


I remember (from Jim Storr's book) that the Indian army division staffs are still supposedly as (relatively) lean and (relatively) quick as the British were in WW2 - and thus quicker than the current mobile bureaucracies of the UK's army, for example.

The Russians tend to sometimes arrive at similar if not identical solutions to certain problems, at other times they follow another route.


Again and again I've heard that there's little to no good innovation to be expected in Russia, China, India and many other non-Western places, but military history and military technology history supports my view that such an attitude is probably not going to survive contact with the enemy.

Compare the surprises that the Finns, Japanese and the -by the 30's supposedly backwardly- Russians had ready for the WW2 era.


This extends into organisational and doctrinal differences, albeit these are more difficult to spot.


I propose thus to use this thread to collect what SWC individuals have learned about such non-Western alternative approaches. Even if they suspect it's only a rumour (just mention it for disclosure if you're really unsure).


*going to be surprised if a "let's learn from the rest of the world thread is going to work in an anglophone setting*



I already mentioned the Indian staff size and add some hardware that differs conceptually from Western equipment

Russia BMP-T fire support AFV
Russia BMD-4 (airborne IFV)
Russia 9K720 'Iskander' (conventional SRB(PG)M)
Russia TOS-1A Buratino (brute force short range MLRS)
Russia T-50/PAK FA fighter with more emphasis on agility than F-22

PRC DF-21D medium range ballistic anti-ship missile
PRC QLB-06 35mm auto grenade rifles

This hardware appears to reveal different 'philosophies' of employment, albeit I still don't quite get the BMP-T rationale.


The Sri Lankan final offensive against the Tamil Tigers is another difference, we already discussed this one in detail, though.
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation