Results 1 to 20 of 99

Thread: End the All-Volunteer Force

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #31
    Council Member AmericanPride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    "Turn left at Greenland." - Ringo Starr
    Posts
    965

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy
    Another example is your use of the GI Bill as evidence that conscription produces better economic outcomes than the AVF. The problem here is that the GI Bill is not tied to conscription, nor is it a required element of conscription. Let's say, for example, that we take away the GI Bill and the economic benefits of the GI Bill. If that happens, then all the economic benefits you ascribe to conscription that are actually produced by the GI Bill go away. Or, alternatively, let's say we give everyone in America the GI Bill - same result.
    Those are viable alternatives which have taken you way too long to bring up. So, as we can see here, the most effective solution may not be the re-institution of the draft, but government programs directed at the economic well-being of the middle class, which would bring us to the large body of evidence that both a government economic policy and a robust middle class are good for the health of a country. I have not claimed the draft to be the exclusive solution for the problems identified in this thread.

    Secondly, WWII drafted a lot of people for a short amount of time and then dumped most of them back into the regular economy. You should not expect, for example, to see the same results by keeping a WWII sized conscript force as a continuous measure.
    The draft period did not end with the end of WW2. It ended in 1973.


    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy
    As to the post-war boom, there are many more factors - factors actually shown as causal - that do relate to and explain American prosperity in that era.
    The expansive access to government economic benefits provided to a majority of the population through a sustained period of time through conscription is one of them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy
    The advocates for conscription in this thread and Tom Ricks judiciously avoid discussing military necessity because it's obvious that military forces rarely need conscription to maintain adequate manpower.
    Military necessity was never a point of contention, so I do not see why you bring it up now as evidence against the intentions of your opponents.

    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy
    In addition to avoiding arguments about military necessity, advocates for conscription also tend to avoid the negative aspects of conscription and the obvious problems with implementation.
    Again, that conscription has consequences of its own was never a point of contention.

    Take care.
    Last edited by AmericanPride; 04-24-2012 at 08:00 PM.
    When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles. - Louis Veuillot

Similar Threads

  1. Is it time for psuedo operations in A-Stan?...
    By jcustis in forum OEF - Afghanistan
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-11-2009, 11:05 AM
  2. SFA capability is rooted in Individual Talent (part 1)
    By Rob Thornton in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 09:30 PM
  3. U.S. Still Waiting For Iraqi Forces To 'Stand Up'
    By SWJED in forum FID & Working With Indigenous Forces
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 06:13 PM
  4. Air Force Operations in Urban Environments Report
    By SWJED in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-28-2006, 04:10 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •