|
|
#61 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calcutta, India
Posts: 942
|
To beat the terrorists at their game could be like what India has done in Kashmir. Deployment on the Border to 'seal' (it can never be 100%) with a second line where there is an anti Infiltration obstacle system. And thereafter there are troops to include para military in bases to operate against those terrorists who have infiltrated and reported to be in location by the locals. It requires adequate troops and one wonders if the US and ISAF would commit that many troops or paramiltiary. The advantage the US and ISAF is that they are cleared to use the air force and artillery. That would make a great difference. One requires to defeat or contain the terrorists and send a message that it won't work before any political measures can be put in place successfully. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,218
|
At the recent IISS briefing on Afghanistan it was pointed out that India had made no actual investments in Afghanistan for two years, nor were there any Indians training the ANSF in country and there were signs that the ISI -v- RAW competition had eased.
Then I found a link by Australia's Lowy Institute, starting with: Quote:
Note the Lowy comment extends to India's position on Iran, which to this faraway observer is well, different.
__________________
davidbfpo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calcutta, India
Posts: 942
|
Pak is wary of Indian influence in Afghan: Pentagon
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pa...tagon/944029/0 Last edited by davidbfpo; 05-01-2012 at 05:33 PM. Reason: Moved here, the right thread by moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver on occasion
Posts: 1,821
|
The report cited by the article says this:
"The year 2011 saw the first ever over year decline in nationwide enemy-initiated attacks in five years. These trends have continued in 2012,". Does anybody know offhand if they mean enemy initiated attacks against ISAF forces or attacks against everybody to include Afghan civilians and gov officials?
__________________
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,218
|
Within a broader strategic article by Paul Rogers are these two paragraphs:
Quote:
Link to original cited article:http://www.opendemocracy.net/paul-ro...hina-next-game
__________________
davidbfpo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 578
|
So presumaly NATO cannot ship supplies via Iran, but India can? Am I correct?
What if NATO buys from India and India ships stuff in via Iran? Just curious. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,218
|
Question numbers added
Quote:
2) Yes given India's relationship with Iran - which mar jar with the USA - it can easily use a Gulf port and the overland routes north. 3) Goods in transit to Afghanistan no problem. 4) Keep being curious. You may one day understand this re-run of the 'Great Game'.
__________________
davidbfpo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Council Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,218
|
On 5th November IISS have an Indian diplomat speaking on this theme:
Quote:
__________________
davidbfpo |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|