Results 1 to 20 of 44

Thread: The Kargil War (new title, all aspects)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #29
    Council Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Calcutta, India
    Posts
    1,124

    Default

    Actually, there was still foodstuff on the Pak intruded posts when they were captured.

    The casualties would depend upon the duration of campaign and the degree of difficulty.

    Now let us look at your blog with 'starving chaps and low on amn'.

    If that was the case, it shows utter irresponsibility of command because a battle or a campaign cannot be conducted without securing lines of communication to ensure uninterrupted logistics.

    It indicates the desire for tactical grandeur without concern for the nuts and bolts of conduct.

    I am not surprised since many Generals of all armies are totally centred on the tactical aspect giving short shrift to logistics!

    The result is what happened to Pakistan in Kargil. Some say that it was a bold plan, but one would tend to be closer to reality - it was a case study of Himalayan blunder with misplaced bravado and military stupidity!
    Last edited by Ray; 10-07-2012 at 09:33 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. China's Emergence as a Superpower (till 2014)
    By SWJED in forum Global Issues & Threats
    Replies: 806
    Last Post: 01-11-2015, 10:00 PM
  2. Doug Macgregor on "Hybrid War"
    By Gian P Gentile in forum Futurists & Theorists
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-10-2010, 11:16 AM
  3. "The Folly of 'Asymmetric War' " is the title
    By Ken White in forum Strategic Compression
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-20-2008, 01:55 PM
  4. The argument to partition Iraq
    By SWJED in forum Iraqi Governance
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-10-2008, 05:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •