SMALL WARS COUNCIL
Go Back   Small Wars Council > Conflicts -- Current & Future > Other, By Region > Europe

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2012   #1
Bill Moore
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default SAS war hero (not) jailed after 'betrayal'

Political correctness to the extreme is threatening UK as much as the US. This is simply unacceptable, the British people need to mobilize and put pressure on the idiots that made this decision.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9669...-betrayal.html

Quote:
Lt Col Richard Williams, who won a Military Cross in Afghanistan in 2001 and was Sgt Nightingale’s commanding officer in Iraq, said the sentence “clearly needed to be overturned immediately”.

He said: “His military career has been ruined and his wife and children face being evicted from their home — this is a total betrayal of a man who dedicated his life to the service of his country.”
Bill Moore is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2012   #2
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default SAS man released by Court Martial Court of Appeal

Quote:
An SAS sniper has been released after his 18 month sentence for illegally possessing a pistol was cut and suspended by the Court of Appeal. Sgt Danny Nightingale, from Crewe, admitted possessing the 9mm Glock pistol and 338 rounds of ammunition at a court martial earlier this month. The judges heard Nightingale had forgotten he had the gun and cut his sentence to 12 months and suspended it.
Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20547557

A slightly unexpected result, partly as the Sgt had admitted the offences, but widely considered outside the military as an injustice. Several e-petitions started and just maybe the court listened. The court being a civilian court and this is the first time its existence has come to the fore.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012   #3
jmm99
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,021
Default Judicial "Nullification",

similar to Jury "Nullification".

Our Ayala case (PMC shot prisoner he had cuffed, where prisoner killed the HTS gal that the PMC was guarding) had a similar result - probation (comments on result, here, here and here).

Army Times article reporting sentencing.

This result met strong disapproval from Zero Antropology, Whitewashing a U.S. War Crime in Afghanistan: The Trial of Don Ayala, “Human Terrain” Mercenary.

Regards

Mike
jmm99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012   #4
Bill Moore
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default

JMM, it seems a huge stretch to compare a contractor who killed a handcuffed person with a soldier who tried (whether intentional or not) to bring a weapon back home from the war zone, which at one time not that long ago wouldn't even considered an offense.
Bill Moore is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2012   #5
jmm99
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,021
Default Bill:

The comparison is to two examples of judicial nullification, not an argument that the crimes were equivalent. Obviously, murder (the original charge in Ayala, a capital crime) and illegal possession of a weapon (18 months) are not the same. Do you think I'm so stupid as to contend they are ?

The judicial decisions in both cases, however, ended up with the same result - both defendants were freed. I don't have any problem with either result. The person who wrote the Zero Antropology article obviously would have held for the murder charge against Ayala - or, if forced by the plea, the maximum sentence for manslaughter. Freedom or detention depends on who your judge (or jury) is.

Regards

Mike
jmm99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012   #6
Bill Moore
Council Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default

Quote:
The comparison is to two examples of judicial nullification, not an argument that the crimes were equivalent. Obviously, murder (the original charge in Ayala, a capital crime) and illegal possession of a weapon (18 months) are not the same. Do you think I'm so stupid as to contend they are ?
The answer to your question is of course not, but I wasn't sure where you were going with your comparison. Thanks for clarifying. Bill
Bill Moore is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012   #7
jmm99
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,021
Default Bill: Admittedly, there is a legal stretch ...

in going from a capital crime down to a lower felony, drawing in this case a $12,500 fine and 5-years probation. I haven't tried to find the sentencing transcript, where I expect the judge laid out the legal reasons for the sentence.

My approval of the sentence was not legalistic - some would say my belief is totally simplistic. We send these young men and women into bad places and worse situations. So, we have to take care of them. I don't ask anyone else to agree with me.

Regards

Mike
jmm99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2012   #8
Fuchs
Council Member
 
Fuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,189
Default

Past achievements must never influence a sanction for illegal behaviour. You cannot accumulate legal goodwill that way. There's no rule of law if you could / can, for law simply doesn't recognise accumulated goodwill.
It only recognises jail time served innocently as accumulated goodwill, and only so to some extent.

I don't think bringing back some minor booty should be a major offence at all, depending on how it was acquired (battlefield pick-up of a Makarov being no problem, taking a golden Saddam gun from a pile of already captured guns is another thing).
Fuchs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2012   #9
jmm99
Council Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,021
Default A wisp of humor ...

Quote:
from Fuchs
Past achievements must never influence a sanction for illegal behaviour. You cannot accumulate legal goodwill that way. There's no rule of law if you could / can, for law simply doesn't recognise accumulated goodwill.
It only recognises jail time served innocently as accumulated goodwill, and only so to some extent.
in a subject matter area that tends to be dreary.

You don't know how funny this really is.

Regards

Mike
jmm99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013   #10
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default

An update, one that I know causes some controversy within the UK military:
Quote:
Despite his conviction being quashed at the Court of Appeal, military prosecutors intend to hold a re-trial. A preparatory hearing is scheduled at the Military Court in Wiltshire on May 1st to commence this process and Danny will plead not-guilty.
Link:http://dannynightingale.org/

Oddly the outline of the case only refers to the pistol found, not the rather large amount of ammunition - which I have yet to see an explanation for.

Yes, there is an appeal for donations.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013   #11
carl
Council Member
 
carl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver on occasion
Posts: 2,448
Default

David:

338 rounds of pistol ammunition is not a large amount of ammunition. 7 boxes gets lost in most people's garden shed. If it was loose it would get lost in the little drawer in the kitchen where you put things you don't know where else to put. Shoot, 200 rounds is just a good afternoon's practice.
__________________
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene
carl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2013   #12
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default

Carl,

I agree that:
Quote:
..338 rounds of pistol ammunition is not a large amount of ammunition...
He may have a good excuse for the gifted pistol being forgotten, but the ammunition there is no explanation to date. It is that big gap that those UK military I spoke simply could not accept, to the extent of dismissing his entire case.
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2013   #13
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default Update

From the BBC:
Quote:
The Medical Board of the British Army said Sgt Danny Nightingale should be discharged on medical grounds after suffering brain damage in 2009. A judge ordered the retrial of the 38-year-old from Crewe, on Wednesday.
Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22387128 and on the re-trial:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22370943

Interesting comment by Sally Nightingale:
Quote:
Danny belonged to one of the finest Regiments in the world because he is a fighter. Although he is obviously upset that his career is over, we'll get it through together and once the Court Martial is over, start his re-integration to civilian life. A bigger question for me is how the Service Prosecuting Authority felt able to say repeatedly during the Court of Appeal proceedings that Danny had been certified fit for duty when it is clear that the opposite was in reality the case.
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 05-02-2013 at 05:50 PM.
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2013   #14
Red Rat
Council Member
 
Red Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Based in UK
Posts: 324
Default

Seems straightforward to me, it depends on the time the Service Prosecuting Authority (SPA) was referring to. I suspect that the SPA was referring to the time of the offence, the Army Medical Board is referring to now.

While serving, like many soldiers, Sergeant Nightingale may have wanted to continue serving (there is nothing to indicate that he did not) and therefore may not have presented the full range of symptoms necessary to make a determination of being unfit to serve. His defence however relied heavily on aspects resulting from his injuries. Different times, perspectives and information presented.

I am slightly disconcerted by this case. A soldier was found with an illegal firearm and ammunition. I think the last time that someone was not jailed for this type of offence was a Dundee Grandmother With Her Grandfather's War Souvenir. The report on the link is worth reading as it goes into many of the legal issues. Firearms is a Reserved Issue with regards to Scottish legislation and there is no significant difference between Scottish and English law on this. English legal precedent is also applicable in Scotland.
__________________
RR

"War is an option of difficulties"
Red Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013   #15
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default Update on medical position and date for re-trial

Hidden away in a BBC regional news area:
Quote:
Danny Nightingale had been recommended for the discharge after suffering brain damage in 2009....the retrial...is expected to start on 1 July.
Link:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22843522
__________________
davidbfpo
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013   #16
davidbfpo
Council Member
 
davidbfpo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 7,822
Default Re-trial over

Sgt Danny Nightingale avoided a jail sentence today, with a suspended jail sentence for possession of the ammunition. The military judge was very critical of the defence given and the public campaign.

Link:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...oids-jail.html or http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23450909
__________________
davidbfpo

Last edited by davidbfpo; 07-25-2013 at 09:36 PM.
davidbfpo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
China's Emergence as a Superpower SWJED Asia-Pacific 739 05-03-2014 02:44 AM
Doug Macgregor on "Hybrid War" Gian P Gentile Futurists & Theorists 15 07-10-2010 11:16 AM
SSI Annual Strategy Conference: The Meaning of War SteveMetz Miscellaneous Goings On 1 03-12-2010 12:24 PM
The argument to partition Iraq SWJED Iraqi Governance 26 03-10-2008 05:18 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7. ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Registered Users are solely responsible for their messages.
Operated by, and site design © 2005-2009, Small Wars Foundation