Originally Posted by
carl
Bill, if you mean by intervention I figure on US troops-absolutely not. I mean aid for the people we call moderates, actual realistic makes a difference aid. I also don't buy that if we do that it inevitably means US troops to follow. It may be moot though. That crew who is running things, at the very top, that crew, are so hopeless that we are on the verge of maybe deciding which group we should support, takfiri killers or Alawite killers. This is great. We're going to have a lot of credibility in the world with this one. We back Assad and we line up with Iran, the Quds force and Hez. That is going to play well in the rest of the world, and Israel. We back the takfiri killers and we line up with AQ, Taliban and the Pak Army/ISI (oh wait, we already dance to whatever tune the Pak Army/ISI plays, dead American soldiers notwithstanding). That is going to play well in the rest of the world too, and Israel. This kind of thing is unbelievable! But it is happening, to us, to my country and yours. Not to mention that CIA op in Benghazi that went bad and got an ambassador killed.
Tell those guys on high you interact with to get a backbone and open up their mouths and take their firing like men. Or resign with honor and open up their mouths. If they have the nerve to try, maybe something will change. Their pensions and careers can't be worth that much.
Bookmarks