Bill:
Can and/or do the Osprey's have door guns or ramp guns so they can shoot back?
Bill:
Can and/or do the Osprey's have door guns or ramp guns so they can shoot back?
"We fight, get beat, rise, and fight again." Gen. Nathanael Greene
Carl,
They can mount a weapon on the ramp, and if memory serves me right they have door guns in the Air Force (Special Operations) version which is the CV-22, not sure what the Marines mount on their version of the V-22 which is the MV-22. They were just coming into Afghanistan during my tour there, so while I saw them, I never flew in one. No doubt lots of guys in SWJ have first hand experience with them and can answer your question. I do recall during the V-22 troubled development phase that one of the issues was how they should be armed.
Technology is always improving, so this comment may be outdated, but it has been my experience that suppressive fire from door gunners (both window and ramp) is just that, it is suppressive fire that isn't very accurate. I know you don't want to hear this, but if someone is shooting at you from within a crowd of unarmed civilians your options are somewhat limited, unless the rules of engagement allow that type of response.
I don't know if SOF or Marines mounted the non-combatant evacuation (NEO) in Sudan, so I don't what version of V-22 went in, and since the weapons are optional, I don't know if they had weapons mounted. Despite the troubled development period, by most accounts the V-22 does give us some pretty good capabilities we didn't have previously.
video link showing tail mounted weapon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZN1EBN5z1I
Last edited by Bill Moore; 12-23-2013 at 01:08 AM. Reason: add link, fix grammar
A short backgrounder, from someone who has been working in South Sudan, this summary says enough:Link:http://www.opendemocracy.net/john-on...acy-of-neglectA power-grab by rebels would come with huge civilian casualties and also set a bad precedent in a country with long ethnic rivalries, lacking a professional military and with an armed civilian population.
I note the UN peacekeepers have taken casualties, as they are Indian soldiers one wonders if this will affect the debate back home on participation. India contributes a third of UNMISS military mission, with battallion groups from: Kenya, Mongolia, Nepal & Rwanda. I note there are (were) four US military observers and twelve police officers.
BBC is now reporting the rebels have seized control of the province where the oil is. The link has six useful map:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25487084
davidbfpo
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/w...n-war/4166537/
Americans evacuated from South Sudan battleground
Looks like the UN conducted the majority of the NEO along with some U.S. civilian helicopters on contract in the region. Probably was the best option, but after all the hype (deserved or not) on Bengazi. I suspect the US government felt compelled to send U.S. forces quickly to prevent political backlash at home.About 380 Americans and 300 citizens of other nations have been evacuated in recent days to Nairobi and other locations on four chartered flights and five military aircraft, Psaki said. An unknown number of people have left on their own and an unknown number remain in Bor and surrounding rural areas.
"The U.S. government is doing everything possible to ensure the safety and security of United States citizens in South Sudan," the statement said. "We are working with our allies around the world to connect with and evacuate U.S. citizens as quickly and safely as possible."
http://gulfnews.com/news/world/other...=News_RSS_feed
Key events in the brief history of South Sudan
A brief and troubled history, so I'm sure the South Sudan watchers were not surprised by this eruption of violence.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-welco...n-south-sudan/
U.S. welcomes birth of new nation, South Sudan
What else could the President say in a diplomatic setting like this? Congratulations on the stillborn birth of your nation?"A proud flag flies over Juba and the map of the world has been redrawn," Mr. Obama said in a statement recognizing the new country. "These symbols speak to the blood that has been spilled, the tears that have been shed, the ballots that have been cast, and the hopes that have been realized by so many millions of people. The eyes of the world are on the Republic of South Sudan. And we know that southern Sudanese have claimed their sovereignty, and shown that neither their dignity nor their dream of self-determination can be denied."
http://www.npr.org/2011/04/27/135773...up-south-sudanSouth Sudan's declaration of independence was achieved because of a U.S.-supported agreement brokered six years ago by the Bush administration, and the hope in Juba is that the U.N. (which authorized a peacekeeping force on Friday) and the U.S. will be able to find the resources to help South Sudan get on its feet.
The U.S. Role In Setting Up South Sudan
April 27, 2011
This is a short read, and it was clear that Mr. Lyman had a realistic perspective in this interview.U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan Princeton Lyman explains the U.S role in setting up the new country.
CONAN: The controversies include?
Mr. LYMAN: Partly because of the opposition parties feel they were not part of the process, partly because they think the transition period of four years is too long and that there should be a government of national unity during that period, not simply a continuation of the present regime.
CONAN: In the meantime, there are so many other institutions that have to be established: a legal system, you have to design a flag and currency and passports, a million things.
Mr. LYMAN: A million things. And there is not a deep level of cadre in the south to handle all these things. They have to set up - as you say, they have to set up a central bank if they're going to have their own currency. They have to set up ministries at the state level, as well as the national level, to deliver services, create courts with the appropriate personnel, passports, as you say, establish treaty relationships as a new country with all the other countries with whom they're dealing - a tremendous amount of work. And they are working very hard at it, but it is quite challenging.
Hey Carl,
There are 50s on the doors and even a Gatling gun on the fuselage
and... you are well aware of what all that firepower doesn't do when a heard of gun slingers on the ground are shooting into the air ala Zairois...
Must be a lot of money to be made in that country for 300 American idiots to stay there and spend our tax dollars to get them out
Merry Christmas !
Regards, Stan
If you want to blend in, take the bus
There is not much room for optimism in this IISS Strategic Comment, another African nation retarded by its own politicians, warlords and others:https://www.iiss.org/en/publications...nt-strife-cd33
This maybe behind a registration "wall".
davidbfpo
I don't watch this situation closely and thought the faction fighting had abated. Instead I learnt this:Link:https://medium.com/war-is-boring/119600c57b95Peacekeepers from the U.N. Mission in South Sudan told their chief Hilde Johnson that people were flocking to UNMISS’ bases seeking protection. In the dark morning hours of Dec. 16, Johnson gave the order to let them in.
The result, four month later, is siege warfare. Tens of thousands of refugees struggle to survive on U.N. bases protected by lightly-armed peacekeepers—while outside the compounds’ walls, killers plan their attacks. Conditions are dire. The future is uncertain. Nearly 100,000 lives are at stake.
(Later) The U.N. has held out for four months. But as with any siege, the attackers have the advantage. It’s only a matter of time before money, supplies and political willpower run out.
davidbfpo
I admit (again) events in South Sudan rarely reach my in-tray, but this headline caught my attention just:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-34083964
The article gives a very short update on the current situation, with more on the American angle and a passing reference to the possible competition with China.
davidbfpo
Bookmarks