He's absolutely incorrect in that respect, on two grounds:
First, none of the cases cited are in any way American "operations".
Second, the idea that the US has the capacity or the responsibility to "impose a leadership" in any other country, or that any such effort would serve the interests of the US or the country in question, is really pretty absurd, an absurdity compounded by the certainty that any American attempt to "impose a leadership" in any of these countries would be greeted by the Russians with an absolute howl of protest.
The whole statement looks to be propaganda, and is unlikely to convince anyone who isn't already reflexively anti-American.
Bookmarks