Opinion: High price for ceasefire in eastern Ukraine
The Kremlin will have achieved its goals - for the time being - if there is a ceasefire in eastern Ukraine. But it wouldn’t mean the end of the conflict, writes DW’s Ingo Mannteufel.http://www.dw.de/opinion-high-price-...en-eu-2092-rdf- A new frozen conflict
- Poroshenko, a loser
- Another loser
To continue Georgia and Ukraine comparsion.
19.08.2008
http://www.nato.int/docu/update/2008...st/e0819a.html“No business as usual”
The Council strongly urged Russia to “take immediate action to withdraw its troops from the area”.
As NATO Secretary General underlined during his press conference, “the NATO-Russia Council meetings would be placed on hold until Russia adhered to the ceasefire and the future of our relations will depend on the concrete actions Russia will take to abide by the … peace plan”. “We are not closing doors”, he said again, but “we…cannot continue with business as usual… as long as Russia does not commit to the principles upon which we agreed to base our relationship”.
31.10.2008
http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_...1#.VAeDNWIaySMKouchner’s Kommersant interview coincided with his talks in St. Petersburg with Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov. In those talks, Kouchner called for a quick start to EU-Russia negotiations on a partnership agreement, signaling a return to business-as-usual after Russia’s recent invasion of Georgia.
At page 20, there is resume about European action after Georgia-Russia war. Good material to compare with today's situation in Ukraine. For example page 12 is like deja vu.
http://www.natolin.edu.pl/pdf/analiz...iza_1_2013.pdf
Bookmarks