-
Council Member
Cv-cc-cr-cv
Lastdingo perhaps you should read Dr. Strange---
http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usmc/cog1.pdf
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute...les/PUB363.pdf
http://www.iwar.org.uk/military/reso...g/art4-w03.pdf
https://www.carlisle.army.mil/srp/ex.../Reilly_J_E_02
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-thry.htm-cog
Will and resolve are considered valid COG.
The question remains what makes up the trans-national guerilla-insurgent-terrorist CV? Based on each level of war. And what would be (genericaly) a local insurgents CV?
It is easy to pick out a counter-insurgents COG and CV. The counterinsurgent is tied to his nation state, or his organization-these are physical. The counter insurgent has to defend physical structures.
Both Lawrence and Vorbeck targeted thier enemies railroad lines-a physical structure. Both gained disproportionate results tieing down large numbers of enemy in static defenses and large amounts of resources in armoring trains etc. Why could they get away with it? Because their 'base' was protected, while the counterinsurgents 'base' was not.
If the 'base' loosely equated to the source of strength, which in turn equates to a COG, is will to resist or resolve to fight then what is the CV?
BTW-I am not stating a fact I am asking a question.
Last edited by TROUFION; 06-11-2007 at 06:16 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks