Results 1 to 20 of 2107

Thread: The Trump impact on US policy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Azor...now I will get on my soap box as it is in my area of expertise...not yours...

    In the world of "information warfare and the spy games" and if you are looking for data for link analysis to input into say an advanced link analysis tool you need to find a common linkage point or series of points not just random data although sometimes that will provide a number of surprises....

    So I always look for "money, people, companies and locations".....or the proverbial "Who, What, when, Where, how and Why...the Five Ws and 1H

    You often quote "The Hill"..have you ever asked yourself who owns its, who invests into it, who writes articles for it and the motive behind those articles...

    Take this article....
    The Hill‏
    @thehill

    "The damaging case against James Comey"
    http://hill.cm/hTv5Blo

    Would it surprise you to find out that two US FARA types are behind the article and as FARAs they are paid out of Russia for their US work?????

    Posted is a picture of both together with Putin and the individual for whom they work......now is that not somehow close to the Flynn Putin RT dinner picture and Putin stating he did not know Flynn nor talked to him even though on the same table...wonder if he knows these two and the oligarch.....

    Will let you wonder about the names of the two and where they are in the photo...

    Both are FARA US agents of Oleg Deripaska an oligarch very close to Putin.

    Deripaska BTW also wanted recently stated he wanted to testify in Congress in support to Flynn and Trump but suddenly he has not left Russia...

    He and Manafort go back a long way together in Ukraine...

    BTW..these two FARA agents were also deeply involved in the NC voting issue...now the circle closes does it not????
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 06-10-2017 at 05:30 AM.

  2. #2
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    More than 19 million saw Comey testimony on TV

    http://politi.co/2raXrBx

    Bet Trump hates this figure as it is far more than those that attended his Inauguration.

  3. #3
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Azor...even with me sitting in Berlin...this tape does exist and is the basis for a criminal racketeering money laundering investigation against the GOP as a political party.....

    This journalist and two others one of which is a retired NSA overseas CI field agent have been breaking story after story which now MSM is slowly and steadily confirming as valid and correct...

    Paul Ryan Taped With Russian Ambassador On GOP Money#Laundering
    #
    Exclusive: Sources with links to the intelligence community now confirm that a tape exists of Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House, discussing how Russian money could be funneled without detection to target GOP campaigns, including Ryan’s.
    These sources report that Mr. Ryan is also on tape discussing how he can best use and disseminate Wikileaks material that was hacked from the DNC by Russia in order to win both his own election and election for Trump.
    Further, sources say, the tape of Mr. Ryan discussing his knowledge of Russia funding the GOP that has previously been published in the Washington Post is in fact a small fragment of a much more damaging tape.
    Patribotics exclusively broke the news of that tape #one week before it was released in the mainstream media. In this story of May 11th I reported:
    On Paul Ryan, Speaker of the House, normally third in the line of succession, I can report as fact that sources say that Ryan has been legally intercepted, and is on tape, admitting that he knew Russian money was being laundered into the Republican party. Without co-operation pending resignation Ryan may find himself swept up into a RICO prosecution involving the apparatus of the Republican party who accepted laundered Russian money.
    A week later Adam Entous at the Washington Post printed his exclusive report on the partial content of that tape.
    My sources had clarified, at the time, that this tape was not the same as I had heard previously, namely, that Paul Ryan was directly on tape at the GOP convention discussing money laundering with the Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak. Reince Priebus was on tape doing so, these sources said.
    Separate sources with links to the intelligence community and justice departments now confirm that there are at least two tapes of Speaker Ryan discussing Russian money, however. One is the tape that I reported and which the Washington Post published. The second, however, is indeed of Ryan speaking with Kislyak at the convention. Sources report that there is signals intelligence, or SIGINT, of Paul Ryan discussing Russian money reaching the GOP and being covered up through companies using the ruling on Citizens United. Further, there is signals intelligence connecting Ryan to discussions on how best to use hacked data from Wikileaks to benefit Trump’s campaign and his own as well as the GOP in general.
    Sources with links to the intelligence community report a widespread belief that Mr. Ryan is being forced to act sympathetic towards Trump and dismissive of the Russian probe because Russia holds kompromat upon him. There is anger, these sources say, amongst rank and file intelligence agents at Paul Ryan’s gross defense of Trump and rank misstatements of Director Comey’s bombshell testimony. Affirmation that Paul Ryan is on tape discussing Wikileaks and Russian money laundering with Sergei Kislyak at the GOP convention – as well as the extensive further tapes that exist of the Washington Post discussion where Ryan admits knowledge of the conspiracy to wash Russian money – may have been passed on in detail in order to remind the Speaker that if Russia holds kompromat on him so does the United States, and he may wish to reconsider his position before constantly defending treason by Donald Trump.
    BTW...pay very close attention who Mueller has now on his investigation team..profession prosecutors and defense lawyers with deep experience and skilled in RICO criminal and racketeering cases and federal constitutional law

    Mueller is enlisting a dream team:
    -Last wk: Top DOJ fraud/corruption expert
    -This wk: Top criminal law expert


    I will bet you a free flight to Berlin if the following is there for all to see when the dust settles...it was all about criminal acts around RICO and money laundering, collusion and cover up...

    BTW check exactly where the individual Hatch sits in the succession line that is just how far down that line this investigation is going right now....and do not for a moment think European intel services have not provided deep insight into actions on some of this line....
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 06-10-2017 at 05:50 AM.

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Azor...BTW two of these journalists have stated weeks ago that there are a total of THREE Grand Juries underway right now with one having finished with sealed indictments.....indictments were for a total of 16 individuals...max 24.

    US MSM is now starting to confirm the second GJ is underway....

    Not a bad run for two social media journalists with better sources than the entire US MSM

    BTW...they are actually sitting on massive stories as their sources have requested they hold them until portions of the investigations are finished...then they can release them...

    Whether you want to believe it or not.....we are seeing history being written...

    AND when it is over you will fully understand the power of Russian non linear information warfare coupled with Russian soft power....MONEY...

  5. #5
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Trump's lawyer also represents Oleg Deripaska, the Russian oligarch, and Sberbank, the largest state owned Russian bank.
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 06-10-2017 at 09:46 PM. Reason: brevity

  6. #6
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Machine counting of ballots in Racine County WI did not match hand count.....in the Presidential election.
    https://youtu.be/D1284ARxFag

    Court just ruled against us in the #GA06 voting machine case. Hackable, unverifiable machines are okay under GA law
    GA06 update.
    Additional briefs filed by both sides. No decision until at least next week.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by OUTLAW 09; 06-10-2017 at 07:00 PM.

  7. #7
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Machine counting of ballots in Racine County WI did not match hand count.....in the Presidential election.
    https://youtu.be/D1284ARxFag

    Court just ruled against us in the #GA06 voting machine case. Hackable, unverifiable machines are okay under GA law
    GA06 update.
    Additional briefs filed by both sides. No decision until at least next week.
    Racine County
    Ugly
    Clinton Peaking around 64% dives to about 47%
    Enough said
    No wonder why they didn’t allow a hand recount here

    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #8
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Brown County
    This is an absolute Mess. No need for words.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #9
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Vote Sleuth
    Investigating Democracy One Precinct at a time
    http://www.votesleuth.org/

    What if I wanted to “hack” an election?

    Let’s say you are running for public office. Campaigning hard, losing sleep over poll results, wishing somehow you could get a guaranteed edge on you opponent. And then one day you get a phone call from a guy who says he can sell you a little computer program that would let you get into those electronic voting machines and change things around.
    The simple program can do whatever you want it to. It can delete votes. It can add new ones. It can “flip” votes so those that should have gone to your opponent instead go to you. You can use this program to change the results of any or all the precincts.
    So how do you use this magical tool?
    You will need to be clever because of all the polls leading up to the election, plus the voter registration numbers by party, plus the exit polls. It would look funny if the results are too different from what is expected.
    Additionally, precincts keep good track of how many ballots are cast, so it’s best not to add or delete votes. Better to flip them – change votes so ones that were cast for your opponent go to you instead.
    It looks like you’re trailing 49% to 51%, so you need to do something.
    But what, exactly?
    Well. You know votes are counted precinct by precinct. And exit poll takers will be there at many of those precincts, hoping to make a prediction even before the polls close.
    And you need to change the results by many thousands of votes in order to close that 2% gap.
    Therefore, it’s best not to touch the small precincts. If only 200 people vote in a given precinct, eyebrows might be raised if you flip even 20 of the votes, because that’s 10% of the total. Which is a lot. Plus 20 votes is a drop in the bucket, compared to the number of votes you need to flip to ensure that you win the election.
    Additionally, each time the “flipping” occurs you run the risk of being caught somehow. An automatic backup might catch your program in the act, or a power interruption might cause it to stop running before it has had a chance to delete itself.
    So it’s much better to leave the small precincts alone, and skim the votes from the larger precincts. In a precinct where 1000 ballots are cast, those 20 votes are only 2% of the total. That’s a small enough amount to easily get lost in the noise, and you minimize the risk of somehow being caught in the act.
    So you set your program to only flip votes in precincts where a certain number of votes have been cast.
    It’s the only sensible way to go about this.

  10. #10
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    35,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OUTLAW 09 View Post
    Vote Sleuth
    Investigating Democracy One Precinct at a time
    http://www.votesleuth.org/

    What if I wanted to “hack” an election?

    Interestingly most of the larger EU countries still use the good old fashion paper ballots that eliminate any thought of "hacking" results and all paper ballots are hand counted twice...

Similar Threads

  1. Germany (catch all, incl. terrorism)
    By DDilegge in forum Europe
    Replies: 355
    Last Post: 06-28-2019, 03:43 PM
  2. LG Hal Mcmaster, National Security Adviser (2017 onwards)
    By SWJ Blog in forum Politics In the Rear
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-05-2018, 01:35 AM
  3. Syria in 2016 (October onwards)
    By OUTLAW 09 in forum Middle East
    Replies: 2624
    Last Post: 12-31-2016, 12:32 PM
  4. The Army: A Profession of Arms
    By Chuck Grenchus, CAPE in forum Miscellaneous Goings On
    Replies: 160
    Last Post: 07-08-2014, 04:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •