If this is true, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Sanchez saying it.Originally Posted by Sanchez
Just my opinion, but I think it’s fair more likely that Sanchez would’ve been fired.Originally Posted by SWJ Blog
CNN Aired November 17, 2006 - 17:00
DONALD RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE: The solution is not military. The solution to that obviously is what Prime Minister Maliki is trying to do and that is a reach out to the Sunni community to attempt to fashion a reconciliation process that will bring together the elements of this country.
Washington Post November 30 2005 Page A18
Last weekend, while other Americans were watching football and eating leftover turkey, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld ended the Iraqi insurgency.
It was easy, really: He declared that the insurgents would, henceforth, no longer be called insurgents.
Over the weekend, I thought to myself, 'You know, that gives them a greater legitimacy than they seem to merit,”
Reported everywhere June 20 2005
“The insurgency in Iraq is in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney
Christian Science Monitor, June 27, 2005
As part of a public relations campaign leading up to President Bush addressing the nation Tuesday night about the war in Iraq, members of the Bush administration have been trying to downplay the strength of the insurgency in Iraq.
IMO, not talking can be considered possible evidence of a disagreement.Originally Posted by SWJ Blog
Originally Posted by Sanchez
If I understand Kilcullen, he says:Originally Posted by SWJ Blog
1) COIN forces in Iraq don’t need to be American. They can be Iraqi.
2) The only way insurgencies end is with a political agreement amongst all the parties involved.
IMO, Sanchez’s statement is consistent with COIN doctrine.
That’s also consistent with the COIN strategy.Originally Posted by Sanchez
That’s consistent with the council’s foremost expert on the subject.Originally Posted by Sanchez
Seems to me Sanchez is saying: We should lower our forces quickly, because the military is strained and large numbers of troops are not producing any progress toward the political agreement that is needed.
And the editorial is saying: We should lower our forces slowly, because even though large numbers of troops aren’t producing any political progress, they might.
Though since I don’t want to be accused of misquoting, here re the exact words, edited and slightly out of order.
Originally Posted by SWJ Blog
It’s a pretty minor disagreement except for the fact that Democrats are one side and Republicans on the other.
Bookmarks