Quote Originally Posted by Sean Osborne View Post
Need agreement here before moing forward to any other positions.
That is unlikely.

But I think we can safely say we have documentd the basis of disagreement. And that's a win, which does enable forward movement to address the next level of so what, impacts, etc.

Even if it doing so has to be marginally presumptive based on the disagreement on the underlying assessments, i.e. where one party says "I still don't believe X is true, but accepting for a moment your assertion that it is, then I <---?> with you that the impact will be Y."