-
I'm unclear on some assumptions that seem to underpin much of the discussion about recent activity in Basra and Nassiriya. My impression is that the following are generally accepted as true:
1. JAM/Sadr is no better or worse than Badr/ISCI in terms of the security situation and any possibility of a future stable Iraq
2. Some type of action had to be taken against JAM and/or Badr in Basra, at some point in the near future
3. JAM has inflicted more damage upon the ISF than the ISF has inflicted upon JAM
If 1 and 3 are accepted as true, could someone please explain why?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks