Quote Originally Posted by ipopescu View Post
It's more like an anti-Rumsfeld screed. Sources are mostly MSM and personal interviews. I do not detect a conscious effort on his part to be very objective, but he's not extremely biased either given that his thesis - Rumsfeld was a very bad SECDEF - is not that controversial. What's interesting as it relates to this thread is that Feith is the only character in the book that comes out worse than Rumsfeld
Do you know what Peter Feaver's take on the book is (given his inside perspective)?