Originally Posted by
RTK
What if we defined COGs as areas of influence, either physical or theoretical, the control of which by either adversarial party places the dominating organization in a position of tactical, operational, or strategic advantage, much like key terrain?
Any thoughts?
I'd second Steve's comments on this. Maybe reformulate it as:
areas of influence, either physical, theoretical or symbolic, the relative influence of which by adversarial parties places the dominating organization in a position of tactical, operational, or strategic advantage
Marc
Bookmarks