and will decide the case.

While the lead of the Times article has a slant (IMO), the remainder does outline the case fairly well - and the jury panel in general. Since Judge Allred has not filed written opinions since the trial began (not unusual), I cannot attest for the reporter's accuracy.

Jury is out for Hamdan -- and the tribunal process
The first person to be tried in a military tribunal at Guantanamo will remain incarcerated no matter the verdict. Concerns remain about the procedure's fairness.
By Carol J. Williams, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
August 4, 2008
GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA -- The war crimes case against Salim Ahmed Hamdan today goes to a jury of his enemies, hand-selected by the Pentagon official who charged him on behalf of a president who has ordered him imprisoned even if acquitted.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,2040961.story

Note: This may already be old news as you read this.

-------------------------------------------
In the related D.C. habeas cases, both Marty Lederman and Lyle Deniston has posted discussions of the overall issues, with links to a number of their previous posts and to the cases and briefs involved (some already cited in previous posts).

Analysis: Is Procedure or Substance (or Both) at the “Core” of the GTMO Habeas Cases?
Saturday, August 2nd, 2008 1:55 pm Marty Lederman
.....
Lyle’s post below continues his indispensable series on the procedural disputes that the district court judges in D.C. are about to (begin to) resolve in the GTMO habeas cases.

Once those questions are answered, however, there is an even more important question lurking, one on which the two sides appear to be even farther apart: What, exactly, is the scope of the authority Congress has conferred upon the President to use indefinite military detention? In other words, what is the proper definition of “enemy combatant”? That was the second question presented in Boumediene, and it was briefed by Paul Clement and Seth Waxman, but the Court did not reach it.

[text with discussion and links follow this]
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysi...-habeas-cases/

Lyle Deniston analysis, ref'd by Lederman, is linked in my post above.