which allows us to consider some Rosenberg evidence as it stands - not as someone says it stands.

There is a considerable amount of other evidence, as well: the trial evidence itself; but also that archived evidence which has come to light in the 50+ years since the trial.

As you say and remind us: "Knowledge is experience. Everything else is just information."

My experience suggests that we are about to see a load of Bravo Sierra (to steal from Stan's parlance) dumped on us about this case.

I expect I will have comments - I love transcripts.

But, not tonite.

Expect I will download the 90+MB to my office computer and cut a CD - but not this week. Since this took almost 60 years to develop, we do not have to be in a hurry.

BTW: for those who are interested in how information and disinformation campaigns develop, this will be a good one to watch. From the comments at the webpage you cited, it has already started.

Thanks for the headsup.