Quote Originally Posted by Culpeper View Post
Well, I waited until at least 75 people opened the post. Our intel must be short on this data. So, with that adage, we can't really state that they are easily replacing their losses? That seems to be a constant argument in favor of the insurgents fighting coalition forces. I know there is some documentation out there if someone would point them out to me I will surely read them. Thanks ahead of time.
Since attacks are not on the decline then insurgents are either replacing their losses without much trouble or are getting more effect from fewer people.

Neither option is good.