Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Military Theory vs. Philosophy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Schmedlap View Post
    "Focused theories would be ones like Wilf's patrol based infantry" are not accessible to the layman who gets his "news" and the sum total of his knowledge regarding military affairs from the evening network broadcasts or CNN. You can have the greatest idea ever, but if it does not excite or interest a significant portion of the population, then it is not going anywhere. It needs to be marketable to a large audience in order to for it to be heard among the giant chorus of ideas out there.
    I think this is very good analysis, how many peopel read Infantry Magazine outside of a select few. Now if Wilf had an agent and renamed it some kind of unique war theory so the Guvmint would have to spend millions on research and get 14 PH'Ds to explain it. He would go down as the greatest living UK Military Theorist known.

  2. #2
    Council Member reed11b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Olympia WA
    Posts
    531

    Default

    How is Slapout based Warfare proceeding by the way?
    Reed
    Quote Originally Posted by sapperfitz82 View Post
    This truly is the bike helmet generation.

  3. #3
    Council Member slapout9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,818

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reed11b View Post
    How is Slapout based Warfare proceeding by the way?
    Reed
    Oh this will take years of developement

  4. #4
    Council Member William F. Owen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The State of Partachia, at the eastern end of the Mediterranean
    Posts
    3,947

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by slapout9 View Post
    I think this is very good analysis, how many peopel read Infantry Magazine outside of a select few. Now if Wilf had an agent and renamed it some kind of unique war theory so the Guvmint would have to spend millions on research and get 14 PH'Ds to explain it. He would go down as the greatest living UK Military Theorist known.
    Errr... well the absence of good or even original ideas would hopefully disqualify me, but I think if say nothing definite, and alter the meaning of words and care less about the practical application, I might make more progress!!


    ...but actually, I couldn't care less about promoting me. I tend to promote other peoples good ideas, and I'd like the ideas to get an airing rather than people get obsessed with the messenger. Would Boyd be as highly regarded if he was a civilian analyst?
    Infinity Journal "I don't care if this works in practice. I want to see it work in theory!"

    - The job of the British Army out here is to kill or capture Communist Terrorists in Malaya.
    - If we can double the ratio of kills per contact, we will soon put an end to the shooting in Malaya.
    Sir Gerald Templer, foreword to the "Conduct of Anti-Terrorist Operations in Malaya," 1958 Edition

Similar Threads

  1. Vietnam collection (lessons plus)
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 140
    Last Post: 06-27-2014, 04:40 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 02:38 PM
  3. CNAS-Foreign Policy Magazine U.S. Military Index
    By SWJED in forum Military - Other
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-20-2008, 02:41 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-10-2007, 02:17 AM
  5. Conference on Professional Military Education
    By SWJED in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 10:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •