morally superior foreign policies

[120mm]

There is something more valid here. If you are going to harm your enemy you should do so, in a way that ensures he never recovers, or cannot recover in a useful amount of time. Yes, pure Nick Machiavelli, and history shows it as being generally true. Better to get 30 years of peace, than 5.

Of course, if your "enemy" is either not really your "enemy" or is not "hittable" militarily, you, my friend, are screwed.

[William F. Owen]

Of course, if your "enemy" is either not really your "enemy" or is not "hittable" militarily, you, my friend, are screwed.

Concur. Gross stupidity and impossible dilemmas should be avoided. Let history be your guide, not your master.