Results 1 to 20 of 55

Thread: Is Irregular Warfare Really "Irregular" Anymore?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #20
    Council Member Ken White's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    8,060

    Default This is taking that Welsh stuff too far...

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    If the leek is very small, then a normal plumber, ( a policeman) might suffice.
    I too can kill me too...
    Exactly. That's my point. I would submit "Combat Operations" and "Security Operations" - nothing to do with any supposed nature of conflict. Your/our conduct is what matters, not what the other clown is up to, or where or how he is up to it, because that will differ vastly.
    However, on a serious note, I think you and Slapout are on to something. Add to that my Son's advisory that any Manual over 100 pages is likely full of garbage and, regardless of worth, is unlikely to be read and / or used by most...

    The two-manual process would work. Apply it to echelon, two for individuals, two for Platoon / Company, two for Bn / Bde, etc. Seriously.

    ADDED:
    "...always strive to maintain the initiative. If we do this we will find that situations will not be perfect but they will be better than before and that will be rather pleasant if we give it a chance to work."
    True dat, Slap...
    Last edited by Ken White; 03-22-2009 at 03:26 PM. Reason: Addendum

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •