US Military Information Operations FM

[invictus0972]

Thanks for the reply. I have read at least one article in which there seems to be a little angst between PSYOP and IO officers:

http://usacac.army.mil/CAC/milreview...ngJanFeb08.pdf

The basic principle of the author, who was PSYOP, was that there was no need for the FA 30 officer because it caused redundancy and confusion. I am new to the field, but I find the debate interesting. As it has for more than 200 years, I am confident doctrine will evolve to the point that most of these questions will be answered. This article is new and may have been already discussed on SWJ, but it is new to me!