...and I am sorry not to be more constructive. It was not your agenda I was referring to. Your question is one worth asking, but I strongly caution against assuming all the questions and observations posed by such articles are worthwhile.
If there is merit in understanding an enemy, it is in how to break his will and subvert his arguments, not understanding him, so as you can empathise with the SOB, and live happily ever after.
Until the enemy gives up the policies you find unacceptable, his physical defeat has got to be the primary purpose.
That is as close to being pragmatic and realistic as I might ever get.
Bookmarks