Originally Posted by
jcustis
FB,
I try to live by the adage that arguing over the Internet is like competing in the Special Olympics because even if you win, you're still retarded.
That said, I offer that you have misread the 28 Articles:
As a former company commander who actually served in Iraq, my read of the work tells me it was not intended to be a presciption for victory, but rather a memory jogger so that the mobilized company commander could frame his thoughts, work, and shape his staff. He wants the guy on the ground to contribute to victory, not be the end all.
Kilcullen also wants the commander to avoid being part of the problem, like the hammer in search of a nail. If you think his work is only good for the insurgents, then I believe that you have misread and missed his point.
Bookmarks