And this is my opinion. It may change.
The issue is not about SOF/SF. I don't think y'all will ever get along, and I never understood why you're under one command. Personally, I thought it was kinda similar to when they did away with specialties for infantry (Bradley grunt = airborne grunt). Just weird.
IMO, y'all need a four-star seat at the table. That's the only way to work within bureaucracies (ricebowls, budgets, egos, etc)...On the big army level, y'all have not done that well since 9/11. ADM Olson wears too many hats. Is he the Chief of staff of SOF, the CoCom of SOF, or equivalent of FORSCOM? He can't do all three jobs, and I think that's hurt y'all a bit.
True, but in some respects, it is the center of the universe. Seriously, well, you may be right on that one.Fort Bragg is already way overcrowded and there are more than enough major headquarters there now.
That's just not a true statement particularly with O's. I know you're probably laughing right now thinking we have enough O's, but you are missing out on some GPF company commanders who excelled working in patrol bases and FID.Selection is open to every qualified candidate.
Plus, some of the enlisted that would make excellent SF's simply don't want to go to school after 3-4 deployments.
Does it matter? I dunno.
Would you be better off if you found a way to integrate them? Probably.
Will it happen? Probably not.
I've tried to look at these issues from a neutral standpoint.
v/r
Mike
Bookmarks