Results 1 to 20 of 311

Thread: Deterrence of Irregular Threats

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #5
    Council Member Bob's World's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,706

    Default Some initial thoughts for consideration

    No powerpoint ranger, but here is an attempt to visualize the problem; and a first cut at defining these characters.

    Non-Nuke States: (Canada, Japan, etc)
    Sovereign States that do not possess nuclear weapons
    Primary Goal: Promote Nationalist goals without burden of Nuke status, but necessarily somewhat subjugated to a Nuke State protector.
    Sanctuary: State status and protective treaties with Nuke State(s)

    Nuke States: (Russia, Israel, etc)
    Sovereign States that possess, or are believed to possess, nuclear weapons
    Primary Goal: Promote Nationalist goals without excessive interference by Nuke States
    Sanctuary: State status and threat of nuclear retaliation

    Failed State: (Somalia, Yemen, etc)
    Semi-Sovereign State that has reverted to tribalism or control by a Quasi or Non-State Actor
    Primary Goal: Survival
    Sanctuary: Lack of recognized state bodies and willingness to operate outside of accepted state system

    Quasi-State Actor: (Hezbollah, Hamas, etc)
    Organizations that have a direct link to the legitimacy of a sovereign state, but that also maintain operations outside that status
    Primary Goal: Nationalist; with links to legitimacy but operating primarily outside the system of states
    Sanctuary: Mix of State Status and Non-state Status played to maximize both

    Non-State Actor: (Al Qaeda, Jemaah Islamiyah, etc)
    Organizations with no linkage to any legitimacy derived from a sovereign state, but that operate in state-like ways to conduct UW
    Primary Goal: Regional or Global; effect change for some distinct cause
    Sanctuary: Non-state status enhanced by supportive populaces experiencing conditions of poor governance and the borders of the states those populaces live within; or protection of a sympathetic state’s borders and sovereign status

    Insurgent Populaces: (FARC, NPA, LTTE, etc)
    Organizations made up of citizens of a state to wage a nationalist insurgent movement (Revolutionary, Separatist or Resistance)
    Primary goal: Nationalist, address poor governance at home, create a separate state, or defeat an invader
    Sanctuary: non-state status and a supportive populace experiencing conditions of poor governance

    Disgruntled Individuals: (Kaczynski, McVeigh, etc)
    Disgruntled individuals who believe so strongly about some cause that they are motivated to conduct acts of terror
    Primary goal: Personal; draw attention to their agenda / cause
    Sanctuary: Laws of their respective states until such time as they violate the same
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Robert C. Jones
    Intellectus Supra Scientia
    (Understanding is more important than Knowledge)

    "The modern COIN mindset is when one arrogantly goes to some foreign land and attempts to make those who live there a lesser version of one's self. The FID mindset is when one humbly goes to some foreign land and seeks first to understand, and then to help in some small way for those who live there to be the best version of their own self." Colonel Robert C. Jones, US Army Special Forces (Retired)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 04:16 PM
  2. Pedagogy for the Long War: Teaching Irregular Warfare
    By CSC2005 in forum Training & Education
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-02-2008, 11:04 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •