Results 1 to 20 of 88

Thread: Kandahar Province: catch all thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Council Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    141

    Default And one more thing ...

    Where do we get these troops, you might ask? Easy.

    We stop the stupid and wasteful MEUs, which are nothing but a chance for a Battalion of Marine infantry to get drunk in yet another port city every week, and we send that Battalion to Kandahar along with some support, maybe a Marine Air-Ground Task force and support along with some Army intel. Presto! A RCT (or almost so)! And for probably less money that it would have taken to send them on a MEU.

    I make absolutely NO apologies for insulting the practice of MEUs or the highly wasteful practice of sitting a Battalion of Marine infantry aboard an Amphibious Assault Dock for nine months. If we ever actually have a national policy where we intend to use "ready reserve" or "forces in readiness," then we can revisit this. For the time being, it's just a waste.

    This practice must stop in order to properly man the campaigns.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Not that you'd know it because apparently the entire US media is focused on USMC operations in Helmand, but the Army's 5/2 Stryker BCT has arrived and is already conducting operations in Kandahar. But you have to google it and/or check the Canadian newspapers to read about it.

  3. #3
    Council Member davidbfpo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,366

    Default Two SWJ links made

    Linked here from SWJ Blog as they are both valuable to this topic:

    http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/200...for-k/#c006057 and earlier http://council.smallwarsjournal.com/...ead.php?t=9154
    Last edited by davidbfpo; 12-15-2009 at 09:05 AM.
    davidbfpo

  4. #4
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    827

    Default

    Forgive the historical analogy, but the Rulers of Qandahar alwys seemed to control the main fild of things down to Quetta and across to the Helmand.

    I keep looking at a decentralized Afghan structure as nothing new, but the traditional Mayor (read Ruler) of Kabul, Mayor of Herat, Mayor of Qandahar thing.

    Now,what does it mean to "control Kandahar? Take and control the city itself 24/7? A control line around the city, or a wall like Samarra?

    My understanding was that there are many well-established neighborhoods, each with their own power structures. Do you engage enough of them, or, like the Brits in Baghdad in the old days, just hold enough neighborhoods to protect government and the polo club?

    Does the city matter in an absolute sense, or is it just controlling the region, or precluding/limiting bad guys?

    What's it worth? (Everything? Nothing?)

    Steve

Similar Threads

  1. Somalia: not piracy catch all thread
    By SWJED in forum Africa
    Replies: 237
    Last Post: 12-11-2017, 01:12 PM
  2. North Korea: catch all thread
    By SWJED in forum Asia-Pacific
    Replies: 408
    Last Post: 04-24-2015, 03:17 PM
  3. Sudan Watch (to July 2012)
    By SWJED in forum Africa
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 03:18 PM
  4. Replies: 316
    Last Post: 11-09-2011, 04:58 PM
  5. Yemen - a catch all thread for 2007-2011
    By SWJED in forum Middle East
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 11:46 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •