This is another excellent example. All successful armies adapt. It is inherent to their nature. However recognising that comes in two forms.
a.) Wow! It's all new and very complex. We have to adapt and become adaptive, because we have never seen this before!
b.) All good armies adapt. They do it based on need, and use evidence and fact on which to base their actions. Why can't we do that? What prevents us doing that and fooling ourselves by saying the things in item A?
IMO, how an Army describes its problems, or fails to, is strongly indicative of how it does or does not understand it's profession.
Bookmarks