"Temporal" occurs when just addressing the insurgent and not the poor governance that gave rise to him. It in effect, pushes the plot of the populace straight down in a reduction of violence, with no corresponding reduction in material poor governance. As soon as this artificial suppression is lifted (the end of the Tito regime in Yugoslavia; the removal of Saddam in Iraq, etc) the populace pops straight up into its "natural" state of insurgency.

For "enduring" both the poor governance and the insurgent are addressed together, pushing the plot of the populace down the inclined axis, into phase 0, where it then must be constantly tended to to keep it there.

While I do not recommend it, one could also ignore the insurgency and simply address poor governance, the violence will linger, but ultimately fade away along with it purpose for existing in the first place.

Best, however, to address both together; but probably better to not engage the violent actor at all then to employ to much state violence against ones own populace in the pursuit of ending the illegal violence. Best to error on the side of too little state violence than too much.