I won't make any claims to how widespread it is, but I have experienced on multiple occasions either a complete ignorance of the capacity, resilience, and experience of the Afghan insurgency or an injurious under-estimation of their abilities. This is of course not to be confused with issues of legal or moral legitimacy, but we must recognize the fact that the insurgency has managed to effectively destroy a COP and nearly overran a vehicle patrol base (FM 3-90 defines destroy as "physically [rendering] an enemy force combat-ineffective until it is reconstituted."; and for awareness, defeat is defined as "when an enemy force has temporarily or permanently lost the physical means or the will to fight" and "the defeated force's commander is unwilling or unable to pursue his adopted course of action").
Is there difficulty in the Army/military/American culture in accepting that an enemy is capable of inflicting serious harm on us without our having made a serious or grave mistake that enables them to do so? Is the Afghan insurgency so weak that it's successes can only come from when we make mistakes? Does this affect our capacity to make accurate assessments of the situation and to craft effective COAs?
Bookmarks