Results 1 to 20 of 248

Thread: The Army Capstone Concept: the Army wants your comments

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #30
    Council Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    94

    Default Just my personal opinion

    Quote Originally Posted by William F. Owen View Post
    From FM 5-0 Final Draft:

    3-40. In understanding the operational environment, the commander and staff focus on defining, analyzing, and synthesizing the characteristics of the operational variables. They do so in the context of the dynamic interactions and relationships among and between relevant operational variables and actors in the operational environment. Often, learning about the nature of the situation helps them to understand the groupings, relationships, or interactions among relevant actors and operational variables. This learning typically involves analysis of the operational variables while examining the dynamic interaction and relationships among the myriad other factors in the operational environment.

    Please can anyone tell me how to translate this? This is just one example of many many paragraphs that are essentially incomprehensible. The part where it says "learning helps them understand" beggars belief. Does this paragraph just say the studying something helps you understand it?

    Have I missed the point?
    Wilf, line by line:

    • "Operational environment" is the Army's new term for battlespace
    • "Operational variables" are PMESII-PT. They are analyzed at the operational/strategic level just as tactical level leaders/staff analyze the "mission variables": METT-TC. Many PMESII-PT variables are related to the ASCOPE acronym used with Civil Considerations in METT-TC:

    http://usacac.army.mil/blog/blogs/co...plication.aspx
    • "Actors in the operational environment" are the friendlies, enemies, neutral and not-so neutral civilians, civil-military, NGOs, etc.
    • But you probably are correct that the final three sentences all relate to the same conceptual thought, which could be combined into a simpler:

    "PMESII-PT analysis must involve learning about the personnel involved with each operational variable and how those variables and people relate to each other."

    I actually like almost everything about the rewrite...except "design" which I don't understand.
    Last edited by Cole; 03-06-2010 at 10:42 PM. Reason: Clarification

Similar Threads

  1. BG McMaster on the Army Capstone Concept (Quicklook Notes)
    By SWJED in forum TRADOC Senior Leaders Conference
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-06-2009, 12:42 PM
  2. Capstone Concept will change Army doctrine
    By SWJED in forum TRADOC Senior Leaders Conference
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-06-2009, 12:42 PM
  3. Efforts Intensify to Train Iraqi Police
    By SWJED in forum The Whole News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-16-2006, 01:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •